annotate docs/evolve-collaboration.rst @ 194:b7145eed54fe

add a known issu

------------------------------------------------
Collaboration Using Evolve: A user story
------------------------------------------------


After having written some code for ticket #42, M W. start a patch (this
will be kind of like a 'work-in-progress' checkpoint initially)::

    $ hg ci -m '[entities] remove magic'

Instant patch ! Note how the default phase of this changeset is (still)
in "draft" state.

This is easily checkable::

    $ hg phase tip
    827: draft

See ? Until the day it becomes a "public" changeset, this can be altered
to no end. How ? It happens with an explicit::

    $ hg phase -p

In practice, pushing to a "publishing" repository can also turn draft
changesets into public ones. Older mercurial releases are automatically
"publishing" since they do not have the notion of non-public changesets
(or mutable history).

During the transition from older mercurial servers to new ones, this will
happen often, so be careful.

Now let's come back to our patch. Next hour sees good progress and W.
wants to complete the patch with the recent stuff (all that's shown by
an "hg diff") to share with a co-worker (let's call him C.W.)::

    $ hg amend -m '[entities] fix frobulator (closes #42)'

Note that we also fix the commit message. (For recovering mq users: this
is just like "hg qrefresh -m").

Before leaving, let's push to the central shared repository. That will
give C.W. the signal that something is ripe for review / further amendments::

    $ hg push # was done with a modern mercurial, draft phase is preserved

The next day, Mr C.W., who arrives very early, can immediately
work out some glitches in the patch.

He then starts two other, for ticket #43 and #44 and finally commits them.
Then, as original worker arrives, he pushes his stuff.

M W., now equipped with enough properly sugared coffee to survive the
next two hours::

    $ hg pull

Then::

    $ hg up "tip ~ 2"

brings him to yesterday's patch. Indeed the patch serial number has
increased (827 still exists but has been obsoleted).

He understands that his original patch has been altered. But how did it
evolve ?

The enhanced hgview shows the two patches. By default only the most
recent version of a patch is shown.

Now, when W. installed the mutable-history extensions, he got an alias
that allows him to see the diff between two amendments, defined like this::

    odiff=diff --rev 'limit(obsparents(.),1)' --rev .

He can see exactly how C.W. amended his work.

* odiff


Amend ... Stabilize
--------------------

Almost perfect ! W. just needs to fix a half dozen grammar oddities in
the new docstrings and it will be publishable.

Then, another round of:

    $ hg amend

and a quick look at hgview ... shows something strange (at first).

Ticket #42 yesterday's version is still showing up, with two descendant lineages:

* the next version, containing grammar fixes,

* the two stacked changesets for tickets #43 .. 44 committed by C.W.

Indeed, since this changeset still has non-obsolete descendant
changesets it cannot be hidden. This branch (old version of #42 and
the two descendants by C.W.) is said to be _unstable_.

Why would one want such a state ? Why not auto-stabilize each time "hg
amend" is spelt ?

W. for one, wouldn't want to merge each time he amends something that
might conflict with the descendant changesets; remember he is
currently updating the very middle of an history !

Being now done with grammar and typo fixes, W. decides it is time to
stabilize again the tree. He:

    $ hg stabilize

two times, one for each unstable descendant. The last time, hgview
shows him a straight line again. Wow ! that feels a bit like a
well-planned surgical operation. At the end, the patient^Wtree has
been properly sewed and any conflict properly handled.

Of course nothing fancy really happened: each "stablilize" can be
understood in terms of a rebase of the next unstable descendant to the
newest version of its parent (including the possible manual conflict
resolution intermission ...).

Except that rebase is a destructive (it removes information from the
repository), unexchangeable operation, and the "evolve + obsolete"
combo, using changeset copy and obsolescence marker, provide evolution
semantics by only adding new information to the repository (but more
on that later).

He pushes again.