comparison tests/test-topic-push.t @ 1887:68125d026b07

push: hackish handeling of new branch head from phase move

The current head checking mechanism is not expecting "head change" from phase
movement. Topic allows that, changeset with a topic moving to public can
create a new head. We introduce a hack to double check that no head were added
at the transaction level to work around this.

1886:0504e76bfbd9

  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files

  $ cd ..

1887:68125d026b07

  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files

  $ cd ..

Test phase move
==================================

setup, two repo knowns about two small topic branch

  $ hg init repoA
  $ hg clone repoA repoB
  updating to branch default
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cat << EOF >> repoA/.hg/hgrc
  > [phases]
  > publish=False
  > EOF
  $ cat << EOF >> repoB/.hg/hgrc
  > [phases]
  > publish=False
  > EOF
  $ cd repoA
  $ echo aaa > base
  $ hg add base
  $ hg commit -m 'CBASE'
  $ echo aaa > aaa
  $ hg add aaa
  $ hg topic topicA
  $ hg commit -m 'CA'
  $ hg up 'desc(CBASE)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo aaa > bbb
  $ hg add bbb
  $ hg topic topicB
  $ hg commit -m 'CB'
  $ cd ..
  $ hg push -R repoA repoB
  pushing to repoB
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 3 files (+1 heads)
  $ hg log -G -R repoA
  @  2 default topicB draft CB
  |
  | o  1 default topicA draft CA
  |/
  o  0 default  draft CBASE
  

We turn different topic to public on each side,

  $ hg -R repoA phase --public topicA
  $ hg -R repoB phase --public topicB

Pushing should complain because it create to heads on default

  $ hg push -R repoA repoB
  pushing to repoB
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  abort: push create a new head on branch "default"
  [255]