comparison hgext/evolve.py @ 298:f597421662f7

obsolete: unify collapsed revisions markers handling

When collapsing A, B and C into D, amend was registering:

  A -> D
  B -> D
  A -> B
  C -> D
  A -> C

while the rebase wrapper was doing:

  A -> D
  B -> D
  C -> D

At this point, I have no argument to favor one or another or even a new
one like:

  A -> B
  B -> C
  C -> D

so I am aligning the rebase implementation on the older amend one. At
least we can now change them all at once.

297:590ac023c536

            if bm:
                repo._bookmarks[bm] = newid
                bookmarks.write(repo)

            # add evolution metadata
            repo.addobsolete(new.node(), old.node())
            for u in updates:
                repo.addobsolete(u.node(), old.node())
                repo.addobsolete(new.node(), u.node())
            oldbookmarks = repo.nodebookmarks(old.node())
            for book in oldbookmarks:
                repo._bookmarks[book] = new.node()
            if oldbookmarks:
                bookmarks.write(repo)

298:f597421662f7

            if bm:
                repo._bookmarks[bm] = newid
                bookmarks.write(repo)

            # add evolution metadata
            collapsed = set([u.node() for u in updates] + [old.node()])
            repo.addcollapsedobsolete(collapsed, new.node())
            oldbookmarks = repo.nodebookmarks(old.node())
            for book in oldbookmarks:
                repo._bookmarks[book] = new.node()
            if oldbookmarks:
                bookmarks.write(repo)