view tests/test-exchange-obsmarkers-case-B1.t @ 4687:313565dd75e3 stable

pick: remove transaction on the whole command (issue6037)

At its core, pick is a pretty straightforward and well-behaving command, it
uses functions already in core hg, it checks that wdir is clean and that
changeset to pick is not public, it checks if there happen to be merge
conflicts and can be --continue'd later, etc.

It is very similar to graft in core (it also uses mergemod.graft function), but
it obsoletes the original changeset. However, graft does not experience this
incorrect behavior from issue 6037.

What happens in the test case for this issue when we pick a revision that
touches both "a" and "b": mergemod.graft() takes the original changeset and
tries to apply it to the wdir, which results in "b" being marked as newly added
and ready to be committed, "a" updated with the new content and being marked as
modified, but "a" also has conflicts. Pick correctly notices this and saves its
state before asking for user intervention. So far so good. However, when the
command raises InterventionRequired to print a user-facing message and exit
while being wrapped in repo.transaction() context manager, the latter partially
undoes what mergemod.graft() did: it unmarks "b" as added. And when user
continues pick, "b" is therefore not tracked and is not included in the
resulting commit.

The transaction is not useful here, because it doesn't touch wdir (it's still
dirty), it doesn't remove pickstate (and other commands will refuse to work
until pick --abort or --continue), it just makes "b" untracked.

The solution is to use repo.transaction() only to wrap code that writes data to
hg store in the final stages of the command after all checks have passed and is
not expected to fail on trivial cases like merge conflicts. For example,
committing the picked changeset. But since pick uses repo.commit() for that,
and because that function already uses a transaction, wrapping it in another
transaction doesn't make sense.

============================================
Testing obsolescence markers push: Cases B.1
============================================

Mercurial pushes obsolescences markers relevant to the "pushed-set", the set of
all changesets that requested to be "in sync" after the push (even if they are
already on both side).

This test belongs to a series of tests checking such set is properly computed
and applied. This does not tests "obsmarkers" discovery capabilities.

Category B: pruning case
TestCase 1: Prune on non-targeted common changeset

B.1 Prune on non-targeted common changeset
==========================================

.. {{{
..     ⊗ B
..     |
..     ◕ A
..     |
..     ● O
.. }}}
..
.. Marker exist from:
..
..  * B (prune)
..
.. Command runs:
..
..  * hg push -r O
..
.. Expected exclude:
..
..  * B (prune)

Setup
-----

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/exchange-obsmarker-util.sh

Initial

  $ setuprepos B.1
  creating test repo for test case B.1
  - pulldest
  - main
  - pushdest
  cd into `main` and proceed with env setup
  $ cd main
  $ mkcommit A
  $ mkcommit B

make both changeset known in remote

  $ hg push -qf ../pushdest
  $ hg push -qf ../pulldest

create prune marker

  $ hg prune -qd '0 0' .
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  f6fbb35d8ac9 (draft): B
  |
  @  f5bc6836db60 (draft): A
  |
  o  a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  
  $ inspect_obsmarkers
  obsstore content
  ================
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'ef1': '0', 'operation': 'prune', 'user': 'test'}
  obshashtree
  ===========
  a9bdc8b26820b1b87d585b82eb0ceb4a2ecdbc04 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7 26563406db05b110410fcfb692bd66c212f15c7a
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 8dff6be5bc7194357b78e44acc79f138eedc075a
  obshashrange
  ============
           rev         node        index         size        depth      obshash
             1 f5bc6836db60            0            2            2 26563406db05
             0 a9bdc8b26820            0            1            1 000000000000
             1 f5bc6836db60            1            1            2 26563406db05
  $ cd ..
  $ cd ..

Actual Test
-----------

  $ dotest B.1 O
  ## Running testcase B.1
  # testing echange of "O" (a9bdc8b26820)
  ## initial state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'ef1': '0', 'operation': 'prune', 'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pushing "O" from main to pushdest
  pushing to pushdest
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  ## post push state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'ef1': '0', 'operation': 'prune', 'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pulling "a9bdc8b26820" from main into pulldest
  pulling from main
  no changes found
  ## post pull state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'ef1': '0', 'operation': 'prune', 'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest