view docs/tutorial/testlib/topic_setup.sh @ 5012:5b5cfb9b0a0b

evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set I annotated the history of this "newer == [()]" condition and found that it was added in the initial stages of evolution project (more than 8 years ago) and there is no test where we get [()] as a successor set. So looks like "if not newer" is enough to check if it is empty. I also looked into obsutil.successorssets() implementation and I don't think it would give us [()] in any case.
author Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com>
date Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:22:18 +0530
parents aad37ffd7d58
children
line wrap: on
line source

#!/bin/sh
. $TESTDIR/testlib/pythonpath.sh

# This file holds logic that is used in many tests.
# It can be called in a test like this:
#  $ . "$TESTDIR/testlib/topic_setup.sh"

# Enable obsolete markers and enable extensions
cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
[experimental]
evolution=createmarkers,exchange

[extensions]
rebase=
topic=
EOF