Mercurial > evolve
view tests/test-topic-fold.t @ 3754:73ee40cbfb53
evolve: return the new replacement node to be stored in evolvestate
While resolving phase-divergence, we can end up obsoleting the phase-divergent
commit in favor of the public commit. Before this patch we return the node of
public commit to store as a replacement of the phase-divergent commit.
The above will not cause any problem till the time we use `hg evolve --abort` on
an interrupted evolve which tries to strip the replacement nodes because it
thinks that the replacements nodes are the ones which are created during the
resolution and are new.
Since we will be stripping a public node, `evolve --abort` will error out saying
cannot strip public changeset, unable to abort evolve which is bad.
We should make sure, replacements should only consist of new nodes formed. If
the instablity is resolved by obsoleting in favour of old changeset, we should
not store the old changeset in replacements in evolvestate.
author | Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 23 May 2018 02:33:14 +0530 |
parents | f7129e3d5a38 |
children | 1bc4b0807c37 |
line wrap: on
line source
test of the fold command ------------------------ $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF > [defaults] > amend=-d "0 0" > fold=-d "0 0" > split=-d "0 0" > amend=-d "0 0" > [web] > push_ssl = false > allow_push = * > [phases] > publish = False > [diff] > git = 1 > unified = 0 > [ui] > interactive = true > [extensions] > EOF $ echo "topic=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/topic/" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "evolve=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/evolve/" >> $HGRCPATH $ mkcommit() { > echo "$1" > "$1" > hg add "$1" > hg ci -m "add $1" $2 $3 > } $ logtopic() { > hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node}\ntopics: {topics}" > } Check that fold keep the topic if all revisions have the topic -------------------------------------------------------------- $ hg init testfold $ cd testfold $ mkcommit ROOT $ hg topic myfeature marked working directory as topic: myfeature $ mkcommit feature1 active topic 'myfeature' grew its first changeset $ mkcommit feature2 $ logtopic @ 2:d76a6166b18c835be9a487c5e21c7d260f0a1676 | topics: myfeature o 1:39e7a938055e87615edf675c24a10997ff05bb06 | topics: myfeature o 0:3e7df3b3b17c6deb4a1c70e790782fdf17af96a7 topics: $ hg fold --exact -r "(tip~1)::" -m "folded" 2 changesets folded 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg stack ### topic: myfeature ### target: default (branch) t1@ folded (current) t0^ add ROOT (base) $ logtopic @ 3:4fd43e5bdc443dc8489edffac19bd8f93ccf1a5c | topics: myfeature o 0:3e7df3b3b17c6deb4a1c70e790782fdf17af96a7 topics: $ hg summary parent: 3:4fd43e5bdc44 tip folded branch: default commit: (clean) update: (current) phases: 2 draft topic: myfeature Check that fold dismis the topic if not all revisions have the topic -------------------------------------------------------------------- (I'm not sure this behavior make senses, but now it is tested) $ hg topic --clear $ mkcommit feature3 created new head (consider using topic for lightweight branches. See 'hg help topic') $ hg topic myotherfeature marked working directory as topic: myotherfeature $ mkcommit feature4 active topic 'myotherfeature' grew its first changeset $ logtopic @ 5:5ded4d6d578c37f339b0716de2e46e12ece7cbde | topics: myotherfeature o 4:bdf6950b9b5b7c6b377c8132667c73ec86d5734f | topics: o 3:4fd43e5bdc443dc8489edffac19bd8f93ccf1a5c | topics: myfeature o 0:3e7df3b3b17c6deb4a1c70e790782fdf17af96a7 topics: $ hg fold --exact -r "(tip~1)::" -m "folded 2" active topic 'myotherfeature' is now empty 2 changesets folded clearing empty topic "myotherfeature" 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ logtopic @ 6:03da8f7238e9a4d708d6b8af402c91c68f271477 | topics: o 3:4fd43e5bdc443dc8489edffac19bd8f93ccf1a5c | topics: myfeature o 0:3e7df3b3b17c6deb4a1c70e790782fdf17af96a7 topics: $ hg summary parent: 6:03da8f7238e9 tip folded 2 branch: default commit: (clean) update: (current) phases: 3 draft