Mercurial > evolve
view docs/obs-implementation.rst @ 166:8f8a52cd0b9f
big doc update
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:50:14 +0200 |
parents | 4e3f25ba5401 |
children | abe52cf492ee |
line wrap: on
line source
----------------------------------------------------- Implementation of Obsolete Marker ----------------------------------------------------- .. warning:: This document is still in heavy work in progress Various technical details ----------------------------------------------------- Some stuff that worse to note. some may deserve their own section later. storing old changeset `````````````````````` The new general delta format allow a very efficient storage of two very similar changesets. Storing obsolete childrens using general delta takes no more place than storing the obsolete diff. Reverted file will even we reused. The whole operation will take much less space the strip backup. Abstraction from history rewriting UI ``````````````````````````````````````````` How Mercurial handle obsolete marker is independent from who decide to create them and what actual operation solve error case. Any of the existing history rewriting UI (rebase, mq, histedit) can lay obsolete marker and resolve situation created by other. To go further a hook system of obsolete marker creation would allow each mechanism to collaborate with other though a standard and central mechanism. Obsolete marker storage ``````````````````````````` Obsolete marker will most likely be stored outside standard history. They are multiple reasons for that: First, obsolete markers are really perpendicular to standard history there is not strong reason to include it here other than convenience. Second, storing obsolete marker inside standard history means: * A changeset must be created every time an obsolete relation is added. Very inconvenient for delete operation. * Obsolete marker must be forged at the creation of the new changeset. This is very inconvenient for split operation. And in general it become complicated to fix history afterward in particular when working with older client. Storing obsolete marker outside history have several pro: * It ease Exchange of obsolete marker without unnecessary obsolete changeset content * It allow tuning the actual storage and protocol exchange while maintaining compatibility with older client through the wire (as we do the repository format) * ease the exchange of obsolete related information during discovery to exchange obsolete changeset relevant to conflict resolution. Exchanging such information deserve a dedicated protocol. Persistent ``````````````````````` *Extinct* changeset and obsolete marker will most likely be garbage collected as some point. However, archive server may decide to keep them forever in order to keep a fully auditable history in it's finest conception. Current status ----------------------------------------------------- An experimental implementatione exists. What have been done so far. * 1-1 obsolete marker stored outside history, * compute obsolete-tip * obsolete marker exchange through pushkey, * compute obsolete, unstable, extinct and suspended set. * hidden extinct changesets for UI. * Use secret phase to remove from discovery obsolete and unstable changeset (to be improved soon) * alter rebase to use obsolete marker instead of stripping. (XXX break --keep for now) * Have an experimental mq-like extension to rewrite history (more on that later) * Have an extension to update and mq repository according evolution of standard (more on that later)