tests/test-issue1502.t

merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally

If a file is not present on the local side, and it's unchanged between other
merge parent and ancestor, we don't use any action, neither we had a if-else
branch for that condition. This leads to bid-merge missing that there is a
such action possible which can be performed.

As test changes demonstrate, we now choose the locally deleted side instead
of choosing the remote one consistently. This is also wrong behavior which is
resulted because of missing possible action. It will be fixed in next patch.

This whole logic is not acurrate as we should prompt user on what to do
when this kind of criss-cross merge is in play.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8940

https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/1502

Initialize repository

  $ hg init foo
  $ touch foo/a && hg -R foo commit -A -m "added a"
  adding a

  $ hg clone foo foo1
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo "bar" > foo1/a && hg -R foo1 commit -m "edit a in foo1"
  $ echo "hi" > foo/a && hg -R foo commit -m "edited a foo"
  $ hg -R foo1 pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/foo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets 273d008d6e8e
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg -R foo1 book branchy
  $ hg -R foo1 book
   * branchy                   1:e3e522925eff

Pull. Bookmark should not jump to new head.

  $ echo "there" >> foo/a && hg -R foo commit -m "edited a again"
  $ hg -R foo1 pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/foo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 84a798d48b17
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg -R foo1 book
   * branchy                   1:e3e522925eff