tests/test-issue1102.t

commit: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the associated `addremove`

This was significantly more complicated than I expected, because multiple
extensions get in the way.

I introduced a context that lazily open the transaction and associated context
to work around these complication. See the inline documentation for details.

Introducing the wrapping transaction remove the need for dirstate-guard (one of
the ultimate goal of all this), and slightly affect the result of a `hg
rollback` after a `hg commit --addremove`. That last part is deemed fine. It
aligns the behavior with what happens after a failed `hg commit --addremove` and
nobody should be using `hg rollback` anyway.

The small output change in the test come from the different transaction timing
and fact the transaction now backup the dirstate before the addremove, which
might mean "no file to backup" when the repository starts from an empty state.

  $ rm -rf a
  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am0
  adding a
  $ hg tag t1 # 1
  $ hg tag --remove t1 # 2

  $ hg co 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg tag -f -r0 t1
  $ hg tags
  tip                                3:a49829c4fc11
  t1                                 0:f7b1eb17ad24

Ensure that the username access fails gracefully if assumptions about the
environment made by python do not hold.

#if windows
  >>> import os
  >>> from mercurial import util
  >>> os.environ.pop('LOGNAME', None) and None
  >>> os.environ.pop('USER', None) and None
  >>> os.environ.pop('LNAME', None) and None
  >>> os.environ.pop('USERNAME', None) and None
  >>> print(util.username())
  None
#endif

  $ cd ..