merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally
If a file is not present on the local side, and it's unchanged between other
merge parent and ancestor, we don't use any action, neither we had a if-else
branch for that condition. This leads to bid-merge missing that there is a
such action possible which can be performed.
As test changes demonstrate, we now choose the locally deleted side instead
of choosing the remote one consistently. This is also wrong behavior which is
resulted because of missing possible action. It will be fixed in next patch.
This whole logic is not acurrate as we should prompt user on what to do
when this kind of criss-cross merge is in play.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8940
$ . "$TESTDIR/helpers-testrepo.sh"
Testing that hghave does not crash when checking features
$ hghave --test-features 2>/dev/null
Testing hghave extensibility for third party tools
$ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
> import hghave
> @hghave.check("custom", "custom hghave feature")
> def has_custom():
> return True
> EOF
(invocation via run-tests.py)
$ cat > test-hghaveaddon.t <<EOF
> #require custom
> $ echo foo
> foo
> EOF
$ ( \
> testrepohgenv; \
> "$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/run-tests.py --with-hg=`which hg` -j 1 \
> $HGTEST_RUN_TESTS_PURE test-hghaveaddon.t \
> )
running 1 tests using 1 parallel processes
.
# Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failed.
(invocation via command line)
$ unset TESTDIR
$ hghave custom
(terminate with exit code 2 at failure of importing hghaveaddon.py)
$ rm hghaveaddon.*
$ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<NO_CHECK_EOF
> importing this file should cause syntax error
> NO_CHECK_EOF
$ hghave custom
failed to import hghaveaddon.py from '.': invalid syntax (hghaveaddon.py, line 1)
[2]