contrib/check-py3-compat.py
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 22:19:00 -0700
changeset 37063 0a6c5cc09a88
parent 32459 778dc37ce683
child 41568 01417ca7f2e2
permissions -rwxr-xr-x
wireproto: define human output side channel frame Currently, the SSH protocol delivers output tailored for people over the stderr file descriptor. The HTTP protocol doesn't have this file descriptor (because it only has an input and output pipe). So it encodes textual output intended for humans within the protocol responses. So response types have a facility for capturing output to be printed to users. Some don't. And sometimes the implementation of how that output is conveyed is super hacky. On top of that, bundle2 has an "output" part that is used to store output that should be printed when this part is encountered. bundle2 also has the concept of "interrupt" chunks, which can be used to signal that the regular bundle2 stream is to be preempted by an out-of-band part that should be processed immediately. This "interrupt" part can be an "output" part and can be used to print data on the receiver. The status quo is inconsistent and insane. We can do better. This commit introduces a dedicated frame type on the frame-based protocol for denoting textual data that should be printed on the receiver. This frame type effectively constitutes a side-channel by which textual data can be printed on the receiver without interfering with other in-progress transmissions, such as the transmission of command responses. But wait - there's more! Previous implementations that transferred textual data basically instructed the client to "print these bytes." This suffered from a few problems. First, the text data that was transmitted and eventually printed originated from a server with a specic i18n configuration. This meant that clients would see text using whatever the i18n settings were on the server. Someone in France could connect to a server in Japan and see unlegible Japanese glyphs - or maybe even mojibake. Second, the normalization of all text data originated on servers resulted in the loss of the ability to apply formatting to that data. Local Mercurial clients can apply specific formatting settings to individual atoms of text. For example, a revision can be colored differently from a commit message. With data over the wire, the potential for this rich formatting was lost. The best you could do (without parsing the text to be printed), was apply a universal label to it and e.g. color it specially. The new mechanism for instructing the peer to print data does not have these limitations. Frames instructing the peer to print text are composed of a formatting string plus arguments. In other words, receivers can plug the formatting string into the i18n database to see if a local translation is available. In addition, each atom being instructed to print has a series of "labels" associated with it. These labels can be mapped to the Mercurial UI's labels so locally configured coloring, styling, etc settings can be applied. What this all means is that textual messages originating on servers can be localized on the client and richly formatted, all while respecting the client's settings. This is slightly more complicated than "print these bytes." But it is vastly more user friendly. FWIW, I'm not aware of other protocols that attempt to encode i18n and textual styling in this manner. You could lobby the claim that this feature is over-engineered. However, if I were to sit in the shoes of a non-English speaker learning how to use version control, I think I would *love* this feature because it would enable me to see richly formatted text in my chosen locale. Anyway, we only implement support for encoding frames of this type and basic tests for that encoding. We'll still need to hook up the server and its ui instance to emit these frames. I recognize this feature may be a bit more controversial than other aspects of the wire protocol because it is a bit "radical." So I'd figured I'd start small to test the waters and see if others feel this feature is worthwhile. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2872

#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# check-py3-compat - check Python 3 compatibility of Mercurial files
#
# Copyright 2015 Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function

import ast
import importlib
import os
import sys
import traceback

def check_compat_py2(f):
    """Check Python 3 compatibility for a file with Python 2"""
    with open(f, 'rb') as fh:
        content = fh.read()
    root = ast.parse(content)

    # Ignore empty files.
    if not root.body:
        return

    futures = set()
    haveprint = False
    for node in ast.walk(root):
        if isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom):
            if node.module == '__future__':
                futures |= set(n.name for n in node.names)
        elif isinstance(node, ast.Print):
            haveprint = True

    if 'absolute_import' not in futures:
        print('%s not using absolute_import' % f)
    if haveprint and 'print_function' not in futures:
        print('%s requires print_function' % f)

def check_compat_py3(f):
    """Check Python 3 compatibility of a file with Python 3."""
    with open(f, 'rb') as fh:
        content = fh.read()

    try:
        ast.parse(content)
    except SyntaxError as e:
        print('%s: invalid syntax: %s' % (f, e))
        return

    # Try to import the module.
    # For now we only support modules in packages because figuring out module
    # paths for things not in a package can be confusing.
    if (f.startswith(('hgdemandimport/', 'hgext/', 'mercurial/'))
        and not f.endswith('__init__.py')):
        assert f.endswith('.py')
        name = f.replace('/', '.')[:-3]
        try:
            importlib.import_module(name)
        except Exception as e:
            exc_type, exc_value, tb = sys.exc_info()
            # We walk the stack and ignore frames from our custom importer,
            # import mechanisms, and stdlib modules. This kinda/sorta
            # emulates CPython behavior in import.c while also attempting
            # to pin blame on a Mercurial file.
            for frame in reversed(traceback.extract_tb(tb)):
                if frame.name == '_call_with_frames_removed':
                    continue
                if 'importlib' in frame.filename:
                    continue
                if 'mercurial/__init__.py' in frame.filename:
                    continue
                if frame.filename.startswith(sys.prefix):
                    continue
                break

            if frame.filename:
                filename = os.path.basename(frame.filename)
                print('%s: error importing: <%s> %s (error at %s:%d)' % (
                      f, type(e).__name__, e, filename, frame.lineno))
            else:
                print('%s: error importing module: <%s> %s (line %d)' % (
                      f, type(e).__name__, e, frame.lineno))

if __name__ == '__main__':
    if sys.version_info[0] == 2:
        fn = check_compat_py2
    else:
        fn = check_compat_py3

    for f in sys.argv[1:]:
        fn(f)

    sys.exit(0)