rm: drop misleading 'use -f' hint for the rm --after 'not removing' warning
A warning mentioning 'forgetting' or 'recording delete' would be more correct
than 'not removing' but also more confusing.
$ hg init
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m test
Do we ever miss a sub-second change?:
$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20; do
> hg co -qC 0
> echo b > a
> hg st
> done
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a
M a