log: rewrite default template to use labels (issue2866)
This is a complete rewrite of the default template to use labels. This
seems ultimately useless to me in most cases. The biggest benefit of
this patch to me seems to be a fairly complicated example of the
templating engine. It was a lot of hard work to figure out the precise
acceptable syntax, since it's almost undocumented. Hat tip to Steve
Losh's smartlog template, which helped me figure out a lot of the
syntax. Hopefully later I can use the present default log template
as an example for documenting the templating engine.
A test is attached. My goal was to match the --color=debug output,
which may differ slightly in newlines from the actual ANSI escape
codes output. I consider this an acceptable invisible deviation.
There seems to be a considerable slowdown with this rewrite.
Before:
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m0.882s
user 0m0.812s
sys 0m0.064s
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m0.872s
user 0m0.796s
sys 0m0.068s
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m0.917s
user 0m0.836s
sys 0m0.076s
After:
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m1.480s
user 0m1.392s
sys 0m0.072s
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m1.500s
user 0m1.400s
sys 0m0.088s
$ time hg log -T default -r .~100::. > /dev/null
real 0m1.462s
user 0m1.364s
sys 0m0.092s
Following the maxim, "make it work, profile, make it faster, in that
order", I deem this slowdown acceptable for now.
I suspect but have not confirmed that a big slowdown comes from
calling keywords twice in the file templates, once to test the
existence of output and again to actually list the output. If so, a
simple speedup might be to improve the templating engine to cache
keywords when called more than once on the same revision.
TODO: I found a bug while working on this. The following stack traces:
hg log -r . -T '{ifcontains(phase, "secret public", "lol", "omg")}\n'
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue522
In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.
$ hg init
$ echo foo > foo
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'
$ echo bar >> foo
$ hg ci -m 'change foo'
$ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
reverting foo
changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e
$ hg up -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ touch bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
bar
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
foo: remote is newer -> g
getting foo
updating: foo 1/1 files (100.00%)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg debugstate | grep foo
n 0 -2 unset foo
$ hg st -A foo
M foo
$ hg ci -m 'merge'
$ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644 foo
$ hg debugindex foo
rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re)
0 0 5 ..... 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
1 5 9 ..... 1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
2 14 5 ..... 2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)