tests/test-push-checkheads-superceed-A1.t
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:41:15 -0700
changeset 40389 1b183edbb68e
parent 35400 4441705b7111
child 42899 34a46d48d24e
permissions -rw-r--r--
repository: teach addgroup() to receive data with missing parents The way the narrow extension works today, the server rewrites outgoing changegroup data to lie about parents when the parents data is missing. It adds the ellipsis flag to the revision so it can be recorded as such in the revlog. In the new wire protocol, such rewriting does not occur on the server (at least not yet anyway). Instead, it is up to the client to recognize when it has received a revision without its parents. This means rewriting will be performed on the client. Furthermore, the mechanism for storing a shallow revision may differ from store to store. For example, the revlog store uses the ellipsis flag to denote a revision's parents have been rewritten. But a non-revlog store may wish to store things differently. And, some stores may not even support receiving shallow revision data! Therefore, it makes sense for the store itself to be making decisions about what to do when they receive revision data without their parents. This commit teaches the addgroup() bulk insert method to accept a boolean argument that indicates whether the incoming data may lack parent revisions. This flag can be set when receiving "shallow" data from a remote. The revlog implementation of this method has been taught to rewrite the missing parent(s) to nullid and to add the ellipsis flag to the revision when a missing parent is encountered. But it only does this if ellipsis flags are enabled on the repo and the incoming data is marked as possibly shallow. An error occurs otherwise. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5165

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case A-1
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another.
TestCase 1: single-changeset branch

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch succeeding to A
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠◔ A'
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir A1
  $ cd A1
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit A1
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  f6082bc4ffef (draft): A1
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/A1/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..