mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate
Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.
This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).
# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com>
# Date 1376350710 -7200
# Tue Aug 13 01:38:30 2013 +0200
# Node ID 60897e264858cdcd46f89e27a702086f08adca02
# Parent 2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352
mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate
Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.
This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue1306
Initialize remote repo with branches:
$ hg init remote
$ cd remote
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -Ama
adding a
$ hg branch br
marked working directory as branch br
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ hg ci -Amb
$ echo c > c
$ hg ci -Amc
adding c
$ hg log
changeset: 2:ae3d9c30ec50
branch: br
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: c
changeset: 1:3f7f930ca414
branch: br
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: b
changeset: 0:cb9a9f314b8b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
$ cd ..
Try cloning -r branch:
$ hg clone -rbr remote local1
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
updating to branch br
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg -R local1 parents
changeset: 2:ae3d9c30ec50
branch: br
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: c
Try cloning -rother clone#branch:
$ hg clone -r0 remote#br local2
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg -R local2 parents
changeset: 0:cb9a9f314b8b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
Try cloning -r1 clone#branch:
$ hg clone -r1 remote#br local3
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
updating to branch br
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg -R local3 parents
changeset: 1:3f7f930ca414
branch: br
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: b