tests/test-status.t
author Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com>
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:38:30 +0200
changeset 19638 20096384754f
parent 19107 fcf08023c011
child 21942 64fe488b5179
permissions -rw-r--r--
mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the .hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using mq. This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the corresponding revisions). # HG changeset patch # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> # Date 1376350710 -7200 # Tue Aug 13 01:38:30 2013 +0200 # Node ID 60897e264858cdcd46f89e27a702086f08adca02 # Parent 2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352 mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the .hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using mq. This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the corresponding revisions).

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ mkdir a b a/1 b/1 b/2
  $ touch in_root a/in_a b/in_b a/1/in_a_1 b/1/in_b_1 b/2/in_b_2

hg status in repo root:

  $ hg status
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root

hg status . in repo root:

  $ hg status .
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root

  $ hg status --cwd a
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd a .
  ? 1/in_a_1
  ? in_a
  $ hg status --cwd a ..
  ? 1/in_a_1
  ? in_a
  ? ../b/1/in_b_1
  ? ../b/2/in_b_2
  ? ../b/in_b
  ? ../in_root

  $ hg status --cwd b
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b .
  ? 1/in_b_1
  ? 2/in_b_2
  ? in_b
  $ hg status --cwd b ..
  ? ../a/1/in_a_1
  ? ../a/in_a
  ? 1/in_b_1
  ? 2/in_b_2
  ? in_b
  ? ../in_root

  $ hg status --cwd a/1
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd a/1 .
  ? in_a_1
  $ hg status --cwd a/1 ..
  ? in_a_1
  ? ../in_a

  $ hg status --cwd b/1
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b/1 .
  ? in_b_1
  $ hg status --cwd b/1 ..
  ? in_b_1
  ? ../2/in_b_2
  ? ../in_b

  $ hg status --cwd b/2
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b/2 .
  ? in_b_2
  $ hg status --cwd b/2 ..
  ? ../1/in_b_1
  ? in_b_2
  ? ../in_b

combining patterns with root and patterns without a root works

  $ hg st a/in_a re:.*b$
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/in_b

  $ cd ..

  $ hg init repo2
  $ cd repo2
  $ touch modified removed deleted ignored
  $ echo "^ignored$" > .hgignore
  $ hg ci -A -m 'initial checkin'
  adding .hgignore
  adding deleted
  adding modified
  adding removed
  $ touch modified added unknown ignored
  $ hg add added
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted

hg status:

  $ hg status
  A added
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

hg status modified added removed deleted unknown never-existed ignored:

  $ hg status modified added removed deleted unknown never-existed ignored
  never-existed: * (glob)
  A added
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

  $ hg copy modified copied

hg status -C:

  $ hg status -C
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

hg status -A:

  $ hg status -A
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown
  I ignored
  C .hgignore
  C modified


  $ echo "^ignoreddir$" > .hgignore
  $ mkdir ignoreddir
  $ touch ignoreddir/file

hg status ignoreddir/file:

  $ hg status ignoreddir/file

hg status -i ignoreddir/file:

  $ hg status -i ignoreddir/file
  I ignoreddir/file
  $ cd ..

Check 'status -q' and some combinations

  $ hg init repo3
  $ cd repo3
  $ touch modified removed deleted ignored
  $ echo "^ignored$" > .hgignore
  $ hg commit -A -m 'initial checkin'
  adding .hgignore
  adding deleted
  adding modified
  adding removed
  $ touch added unknown ignored
  $ hg add added
  $ echo "test" >> modified
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted
  $ hg copy modified copied

Run status with 2 different flags.
Check if result is the same or different.
If result is not as expected, raise error

  $ assert() {
  >     hg status $1 > ../a
  >     hg status $2 > ../b
  >     if diff ../a ../b > /dev/null; then
  >         out=0
  >     else
  >         out=1
  >     fi
  >     if [ $3 -eq 0 ]; then
  >         df="same"
  >     else
  >         df="different"
  >     fi
  >     if [ $out -ne $3 ]; then
  >         echo "Error on $1 and $2, should be $df."
  >     fi
  > }

Assert flag1 flag2 [0-same | 1-different]

  $ assert "-q" "-mard"      0
  $ assert "-A" "-marduicC"  0
  $ assert "-qA" "-mardcC"   0
  $ assert "-qAui" "-A"      0
  $ assert "-qAu" "-marducC" 0
  $ assert "-qAi" "-mardicC" 0
  $ assert "-qu" "-u"        0
  $ assert "-q" "-u"         1
  $ assert "-m" "-a"         1
  $ assert "-r" "-d"         1
  $ cd ..

  $ hg init repo4
  $ cd repo4
  $ touch modified removed deleted
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'initial checkin'
  $ touch added unknown
  $ hg add added
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted
  $ echo x > modified
  $ hg copy modified copied
  $ hg ci -m 'test checkin' -d "1000001 0"
  $ rm *
  $ touch unrelated
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'unrelated checkin' -d "1000002 0"

hg status --change 1:

  $ hg status --change 1
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
  R removed

hg status --change 1 unrelated:

  $ hg status --change 1 unrelated

hg status -C --change 1 added modified copied removed deleted:

  $ hg status -C --change 1 added modified copied removed deleted
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed

hg status -A --change 1 and revset:

  $ hg status -A --change '1|1'
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  C deleted

  $ cd ..

hg status of binary file starting with '\1\n', a separator for metadata:

  $ hg init repo5
  $ cd repo5
  >>> open("010a", "wb").write("\1\nfoo")
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'initial checkin'
  $ hg status -A
  C 010a

  >>> open("010a", "wb").write("\1\nbar")
  $ hg status -A
  M 010a
  $ hg ci -q -m 'modify 010a'
  $ hg status -A --rev 0:1
  M 010a

  $ touch empty
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'add another file'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1:2 010a
  C 010a

  $ cd ..

test "hg status" with "directory pattern" which matches against files
only known on target revision.

  $ hg init repo6
  $ cd repo6

  $ echo a > a.txt
  $ hg add a.txt
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ mkdir -p 1/2/3/4/5
  $ echo b > 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg add 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg commit -m '#1'

  $ hg update -C 0 > /dev/null
  $ hg status -A
  C a.txt

the directory matching against specified pattern should be removed,
because directory existence prevents 'dirstate.walk()' from showing
warning message about such pattern.

  $ test ! -d 1
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3/4/5
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt

#if windows
  $ hg --config ui.slash=false status -A --rev 1 1
  R 1\2\3\4\5\b.txt
#endif

  $ cd ..