mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate
Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.
This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).
# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com>
# Date 1376350710 -7200
# Tue Aug 13 01:38:30 2013 +0200
# Node ID 60897e264858cdcd46f89e27a702086f08adca02
# Parent 2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352
mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate
Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.
This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).
Test unionrepo functionality
Create one repository
$ hg init repo1
$ cd repo1
$ touch repo1-0
$ echo repo1-0 > f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-0
$ touch repo1-1
$ echo repo1-1 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-1
$ touch repo1-2
$ echo repo1-2 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-2
$ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
$ tip1=`hg id -q`
$ cd ..
- and a clone with a not-completely-trivial history
$ hg clone -q repo1 --rev 0 repo2
$ cd repo2
$ touch repo2-1
$ sed '1i\
> repo2-1 at top
> ' f > f.tmp
$ mv f.tmp f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo2-1
$ touch repo2-2
$ hg pull -q ../repo1 -r 1
$ hg merge -q
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo2-2-merge
$ touch repo2-3
$ echo repo2-3 >> f
$ hg ci -mrepo2-3
$ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
4:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
3:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
2:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
1:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
$ cd ..
revisions from repo2 appear as appended / pulled to repo1
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
4:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
3:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
manifest can be retrieved for revisions in both repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 mani -r $tip1
f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 mani -r 4
f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo2-1
repo2-2
files can be retrieved form both repos
$ hg -R repo1 cat repo1/f -r2
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 cat -r$tip1 repo1/f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 cat -r4 $TESTTMP/repo1/f
repo2-1 at top
repo1-0
repo1-1
files can be compared across repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 diff -r$tip1 -rtip
diff -r 68c0685446a3 -r 2f0d178c469c f
--- a/f Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/f Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+repo2-1 at top
repo1-0
repo1-1
-repo1-2
+repo2-3
heads from both repos are found correctly
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 heads --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
revsets works across repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 id -r "ancestor($tip1, 5)"
8a58db72e69d
annotate works - an indication that linkrevs works
$ hg --cwd repo1 -Runion:../repo2 annotate $TESTTMP/repo1/f -r tip
3: repo2-1 at top
0: repo1-0
1: repo1-1
5: repo2-3
union repos can be cloned ... and clones works correctly
$ hg clone -U union:repo1+repo2 repo3
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 6 changesets with 11 changes to 6 files (+1 heads)
$ hg -R repo3 paths
default = union:repo1+repo2
$ hg -R repo3 verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
6 files, 6 changesets, 11 total revisions
$ hg -R repo3 heads --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
$ hg -R repo3 log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
4:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
3:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0