tests/test-update-reverse.t

mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate

Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.

This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).


# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <[e-mail]>
# Date 1376350710 -7200
#      Tue Aug 13 01:38:30 2013 +0200
# Node ID 60897e264858cdcd46f89e27a702086f08adca02
# Parent  2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352
mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate

Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not
work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the
.hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using
mq.

This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush
tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos
after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on
the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub
command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos
on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a
given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this
revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the
corresponding revisions).

  $ hg init

  $ touch a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "Added a"

  $ touch main
  $ hg add main
  $ hg commit -m "Added main"
  $ hg checkout 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

'main' should be gone:

  $ ls
  a

  $ touch side1
  $ hg add side1
  $ hg commit -m "Added side1"
  created new head
  $ touch side2
  $ hg add side2
  $ hg commit -m "Added side2"

  $ hg log
  changeset:   3:91ebc10ed028
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side2
  
  changeset:   2:b932d7dbb1e1
  parent:      0:c2eda428b523
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side1
  
  changeset:   1:71a760306caf
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added main
  
  changeset:   0:c2eda428b523
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added a
  

  $ hg heads
  changeset:   3:91ebc10ed028
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side2
  
  changeset:   1:71a760306caf
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added main
  
  $ ls
  a
  side1
  side2

  $ hg update --debug -C 1
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: False, force: True, partial: False
   ancestor: 91ebc10ed028+, local: 91ebc10ed028+, remote: 71a760306caf
   side1: other deleted -> r
   side2: other deleted -> r
   main: remote created -> g
  removing side1
  removing side2
  updating: side2 2/3 files (66.67%)
  getting main
  updating: main 3/3 files (100.00%)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ ls
  a
  main