obsolete: explicitly track folds inside the markers
We now record information to be able to recognize "fold" event from
obsolescence markers. To do so, we track the following pieces of information:
a) a fold ID. Unique to that fold (per successor),
b) the number of predecessors,
c) the index of the predecessor in that fold.
We will now be able to create an algorithm able to find "predecessorssets".
We now store this data in the generic "metadata" field of the markers.
Updating the format to have a more compact storage for this would be useful.
This way of tracking a fold through multiple markers could be applied to split
too. This would have two advantages:
1) We get a simpler format, since number of successors is limited to [0-1].
2) We can better deal with situations where only some of the split successors
are pushed to a remote repository.
We should look into the relevance of such a change before updating the on-disk
format.
note: unlike splits, folds do not have to deal with cases where only some of
the markers have been synchronized. As they all share the same successor
changesets, they are all relevant to the same nodes.
====================================
Testing head checking code: Case A-7
====================================
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.
Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another.
TestCase 7: multi-changeset branch, split on multiple other, (head on its own branch), same number of head
.. old-state:
..
.. * 2 branch (1-changeset, and 2-changesets)
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 1 new branch superceeding the head of the old-2-changesets-branch,
.. * 1 new changesets on the old-1-changeset-branch superceeding the base of the other
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
.. B ø⇠◔ B'
.. | |
.. A'◔⇢ø |
.. | |/
.. C ● |
.. \|
.. ●
$ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh
Test setup
----------
$ mkdir A7
$ cd A7
$ setuprepos
creating basic server and client repo
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd server
$ mkcommit B0
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit C0
created new head
$ cd ../client
$ hg pull
pulling from $TESTTMP/A7/server
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
new changesets d73caddc5533:0f88766e02d6 (2 drafts)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg up 'desc(C0)'
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit A1
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit B1
created new head
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
1 new orphan changesets
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(B0)" ` `getid "desc(B1)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
$ hg log -G --hidden
@ 25c56d33e4c4 (draft): B1
|
| o a0802eb7fc1b (draft): A1
| |
| o 0f88766e02d6 (draft): C0
|/
| x d73caddc5533 (draft): B0
| |
| x 8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
|/
o 1e4be0697311 (public): root
Actual testing
--------------
$ hg push
pushing to $TESTTMP/A7/server
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
2 new obsolescence markers
obsoleted 2 changesets
$ cd ../..