tests/test-rename-after-merge.t

obsolete: explicitly track folds inside the markers

We now record information to be able to recognize "fold" event from
obsolescence markers. To do so, we track the following pieces of information:

a) a fold ID. Unique to that fold (per successor),
b) the number of predecessors,
c) the index of the predecessor in that fold.

We will now be able to create an algorithm able to find "predecessorssets".

We now store this data in the generic "metadata" field of the markers.
Updating the format to have a more compact storage for this would be useful.

This way of tracking a fold through multiple markers could be applied to split
too. This would have two advantages:

1) We get a simpler format, since number of successors is limited to [0-1].
2) We can better deal with situations where only some of the split successors
   are pushed to a remote repository.

We should look into the relevance of such a change before updating the on-disk
format.

note: unlike splits, folds do not have to deal with cases where only some of
the markers have been synchronized. As they all share the same successor
changesets, they are all relevant to the same nodes.

Issue746: renaming files brought by the second parent of a merge was
broken.

Create source repository:

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am a
  adding a
  $ cd ..

Fork source repository:

  $ hg clone t t2
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd t2
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -Am b
  adding b

Update source repository:

  $ cd ../t
  $ echo a >> a
  $ hg ci -m a2

Merge repositories:

  $ hg pull ../t2
  pulling from ../t2
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets d2ae7f538514
  1 local changesets published
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg st
  M b

Rename b as c:

  $ hg mv b c
  $ hg st
  A c
  R b

Rename back c as b:

  $ hg mv c b
  $ hg st
  M b

  $ cd ..

Issue 1476: renaming a first parent file into another first parent
file while none of them belong to the second parent was broken

  $ hg init repo1476
  $ cd repo1476
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am adda
  adding a
  $ echo b1 > b1
  $ echo b2 > b2
  $ hg ci -Am changea
  adding b1
  adding b2
  $ hg up -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo c1 > c1
  $ echo c2 > c2
  $ hg ci -Am addcandd
  adding c1
  adding c2
  created new head

Merge heads:

  $ hg merge
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg mv -Af c1 c2

Commit issue 1476:

  $ hg ci -m merge

  $ hg log -r tip -C -v | grep copies
  copies:      c2 (c1)

  $ hg rollback
  repository tip rolled back to revision 2 (undo commit)
  working directory now based on revisions 2 and 1

  $ hg up -C .
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Merge heads again:

  $ hg merge
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg mv -Af b1 b2

Commit issue 1476 with a rename on the other side:

  $ hg ci -m merge

  $ hg log -r tip -C -v | grep copies
  copies:      b2 (b1)

  $ cd ..