tests/test-branch-tag-confict.t
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:44:01 -0800
changeset 27897 2fdbf22a1b63
parent 16913 f2719b387380
permissions -rw-r--r--
streamclone: use backgroundfilecloser (issue4889) Closing files that have been appended to is slow on Windows/NTFS. CloseHandle() calls on this platform often take 1-10ms - and that's on my i7-6700K Skylake processor with a modern and fast SSD. Contrast with other I/O operations, such as writing data, which take <100us. This means that creating/appending thousands of files can add significant overhead. For example, cloning mozilla-central creates ~232,000 revlog files. Assuming 1ms per CloseHandle(), that yields 232s (3:52) of wall time waiting for file closes! The impact of this overhead can be measured most directly when applying stream clone bundles. Applying these files is effectively uncompressing a tar archive (read: it's very fast). Using a RAM disk (read: no I/O wait), the difference in wall time for a `hg debugapplystreamclonebundle` for a ~1731 MB mozilla-central bundle between Windows and Linux from the same machine is drastic: Linux: ~12.8s (128MB/s) Windows: ~352.0s (4.7MB/s) Windows is ~27.5x slower. Yikes! After this patch: Linux: ~12.8s (128MB/s) Windows: ~102.1s (16.1MB/s) Windows is now ~3.4x faster. Unfortunately, it is still ~8x slower than Linux. Profiling reveals a few hot code paths that could likely be improved. But those are for other patches. This patch introduces test-clone-uncompressed.t because existing tests of `clone --uncompressed` are scattered about and adding a variation for background thread closing to e.g. test-http.t doesn't feel correct.

Initial setup.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ touch thefile
  $ hg ci -A -m 'Initial commit.'
  adding thefile

Create a tag.

  $ hg tag branchortag

Create a branch with the same name as the tag.

  $ hg branch branchortag
  marked working directory as branch branchortag
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg ci -m 'Create a branch with the same name as a tag.'

This is what we have:

  $ hg log
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  
  changeset:   1:2635c45ca99b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added tag branchortag for changeset f57387372b5d
  
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Update to the tag:

  $ hg up 'tag(branchortag)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Updating to the branch:

  $ hg up 'branch(branchortag)'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  

  $ cd ..