tests/test-patch.t
author FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp>
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:40:04 +0900
changeset 26630 3111b45a2bbf
parent 15194 0705f2ac79d6
child 32958 75be14993fda
permissions -rw-r--r--
parsers: make pack_dirstate take now in integer for consistency On recent OS, 'stat.st_mtime' has a double precision floating point value to represent nano seconds, but it is not wide enough for actual file timestamp: nowadays, only 52 - 32 = 20 bit width is available for decimal places in sec. Therefore, casting it to 'int' may cause unexpected result. See also changeset 13272104bb07 fixing issue4836 for detail. For example, changed file A may be treated as "clean" unexpectedly in steps below. "rounded now" is the value gotten by rounding via 'int(st.st_mtime)' or so. ---------------------+--------------------+------------------------ "now" | | timestamp of A (time_t) float rounded time_t| action | FS dirstate ------ ------- ------+--------------------+-------- --------------- N+.nnn N N | | --- --- | update file A | N | dirstate.normal(A) | N N+.999 N+1 N | | | dirstate.write() | N (*1) | : | | change file A | N | : | N+1.00 N+1 N+1 | | | "hg status" (*2) | N N ------ ------- ------+--------------------+-------- --------------- Timestamp N of A in dirstate isn't dropped at (*1), because "rounded now" is N+1 at that time, even if 'st_mtime' in 'time_t' is still N. Then, file A is unexpectedly treated as "clean" at (*2) in this case. For consistent handling of 'stat.st_mtime', this patch makes 'pack_dirstate()' take 'now' argument not in floating point but in integer. This patch makes 'PyArg_ParseTuple()' in 'pack_dirstate()' use format 'i' (= checking type mismatch or overflow), even though it is ensured that 'now' is in the range of 32bit signed integer by masking with '_rangemask' (= 0x7fffffff) on caller side. It should be cheaper enough than packing itself, and useful to detect that legacy code invokes 'pack_dirstate()' with 'now' in floating point value.

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..