view tests/test-ancestor.py @ 26379:39d643252b9f

revlog: use existing file handle when reading during _addrevision

_addrevision() may need to read from revlogs as part of computing
deltas. Previously, we would flush existing file handles and open
a new, short-lived file handle to perform the reading.

If we have an existing file handle, it seems logical to reuse it
for reading instead of opening a new file handle. This patch
makes that the new behavior.

After this patch, revlog files are only reopened when adding
revisions if the revlog is switched from inline to non-inline.

On Linux when unbundling a bundle of the mozilla-central repo, this
patch has the following impact on system call counts:

Call     Before     After       Delta
write    827,639    673,390   -154,249
open     700,103    684,089    -16,014
read      74,489     74,489          0
fstat    493,924    461,896    -32,028
close    249,131    233,117    -16,014
stat     242,001    242,001          0
lstat     18,676     18,676          0
lseek     20,268     20,268          0
ioctl     14,652     13,173     -1,479
TOTAL  3,180,758  2,930,679   -250,079

It's worth noting that many of the open() calls fail due to missing
files. That's why there are many more open() calls than close().

Despite the significant system call reduction, this change does not
seem to have a significant performance impact on Linux.

On Windows 10 (not a VM, on a SSD), this patch appears to reduce
unbundle time for mozilla-central from ~960s to ~920s. This isn't
as significant as I was hoping. But a decrease it is nonetheless.
Still, Windows unbundle performance is still >2x slower than Linux.

Despite the lack of significant gains, fewer system calls is fewer
system calls. If nothing else, this will narrow the focus of potential
areas to optimize in the future.

from mercurial import ancestor, commands, hg, ui, util
from mercurial.node import nullrev
import binascii, getopt, math, os, random, sys, time

def buildgraph(rng, nodes=100, rootprob=0.05, mergeprob=0.2, prevprob=0.7):
    '''nodes: total number of nodes in the graph
    rootprob: probability that a new node (not 0) will be a root
    mergeprob: probability that, excluding a root a node will be a merge
    prevprob: probability that p1 will be the previous node

    return value is a graph represented as an adjacency list.
    '''
    graph = [None] * nodes
    for i in xrange(nodes):
        if i == 0 or rng.random() < rootprob:
            graph[i] = [nullrev]
        elif i == 1:
            graph[i] = [0]
        elif rng.random() < mergeprob:
            if i == 2 or rng.random() < prevprob:
                # p1 is prev
                p1 = i - 1
            else:
                p1 = rng.randrange(i - 1)
            p2 = rng.choice(range(0, p1) + range(p1 + 1, i))
            graph[i] = [p1, p2]
        elif rng.random() < prevprob:
            graph[i] = [i - 1]
        else:
            graph[i] = [rng.randrange(i - 1)]

    return graph

def buildancestorsets(graph):
    ancs = [None] * len(graph)
    for i in xrange(len(graph)):
        ancs[i] = set([i])
        if graph[i] == [nullrev]:
            continue
        for p in graph[i]:
            ancs[i].update(ancs[p])
    return ancs

class naiveincrementalmissingancestors(object):
    def __init__(self, ancs, bases):
        self.ancs = ancs
        self.bases = set(bases)
    def addbases(self, newbases):
        self.bases.update(newbases)
    def removeancestorsfrom(self, revs):
        for base in self.bases:
            if base != nullrev:
                revs.difference_update(self.ancs[base])
        revs.discard(nullrev)
    def missingancestors(self, revs):
        res = set()
        for rev in revs:
            if rev != nullrev:
                res.update(self.ancs[rev])
        for base in self.bases:
            if base != nullrev:
                res.difference_update(self.ancs[base])
        return sorted(res)

def test_missingancestors(seed, rng):
    # empirically observed to take around 1 second
    graphcount = 100
    testcount = 10
    inccount = 10
    nerrs = [0]
    # the default mu and sigma give us a nice distribution of mostly
    # single-digit counts (including 0) with some higher ones
    def lognormrandom(mu, sigma):
        return int(math.floor(rng.lognormvariate(mu, sigma)))

    def samplerevs(nodes, mu=1.1, sigma=0.8):
        count = min(lognormrandom(mu, sigma), len(nodes))
        return rng.sample(nodes, count)

    def err(seed, graph, bases, seq, output, expected):
        if nerrs[0] == 0:
            print >> sys.stderr, 'seed:', hex(seed)[:-1]
        if gerrs[0] == 0:
            print >> sys.stderr, 'graph:', graph
        print >> sys.stderr, '* bases:', bases
        print >> sys.stderr, '* seq: ', seq
        print >> sys.stderr, '*  output:  ', output
        print >> sys.stderr, '*  expected:', expected
        nerrs[0] += 1
        gerrs[0] += 1

    for g in xrange(graphcount):
        graph = buildgraph(rng)
        ancs = buildancestorsets(graph)
        gerrs = [0]
        for _ in xrange(testcount):
            # start from nullrev to include it as a possibility
            graphnodes = range(nullrev, len(graph))
            bases = samplerevs(graphnodes)

            # fast algorithm
            inc = ancestor.incrementalmissingancestors(graph.__getitem__, bases)
            # reference slow algorithm
            naiveinc = naiveincrementalmissingancestors(ancs, bases)
            seq = []
            revs = []
            for _ in xrange(inccount):
                if rng.random() < 0.2:
                    newbases = samplerevs(graphnodes)
                    seq.append(('addbases', newbases))
                    inc.addbases(newbases)
                    naiveinc.addbases(newbases)
                if rng.random() < 0.4:
                    # larger set so that there are more revs to remove from
                    revs = samplerevs(graphnodes, mu=1.5)
                    seq.append(('removeancestorsfrom', revs))
                    hrevs = set(revs)
                    rrevs = set(revs)
                    inc.removeancestorsfrom(hrevs)
                    naiveinc.removeancestorsfrom(rrevs)
                    if hrevs != rrevs:
                        err(seed, graph, bases, seq, sorted(hrevs),
                            sorted(rrevs))
                else:
                    revs = samplerevs(graphnodes)
                    seq.append(('missingancestors', revs))
                    h = inc.missingancestors(revs)
                    r = naiveinc.missingancestors(revs)
                    if h != r:
                        err(seed, graph, bases, seq, h, r)

# graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph:
# o  13
# |
# | o  12
# | |
# | | o    11
# | | |\
# | | | | o  10
# | | | | |
# | o---+ |  9
# | | | | |
# o | | | |  8
#  / / / /
# | | o |  7
# | | | |
# o---+ |  6
#  / / /
# | | o  5
# | |/
# | o  4
# | |
# o |  3
# | |
# | o  2
# |/
# o  1
# |
# o  0

graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4],
         7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9],
         13: [8]}

def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False):
    print ("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" %
           (revs, stoprev, inclusive))
    return ancestor.lazyancestors(graph.get, revs, stoprev=stoprev,
                                  inclusive=inclusive)

def printlazyancestors(s, l):
    print 'membership: %r' % [n for n in l if n in s]
    print 'iteration:  %r' % list(s)

def test_lazyancestors():
    # Empty revs
    s = genlazyancestors([])
    printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1])

    # Standard example
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13])
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Standard with ancestry in the initial set (1 is ancestor of 3)
    s = genlazyancestors([1, 3])
    printlazyancestors(s, [1, -1, 0])

    # Including revs
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Test with stoprev
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])


# The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of
# DAGs that have been known to be problematic.
dagtests = [
    '+2*2*2/*3/2',
    '+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2',
]
def test_gca():
    u = ui.ui()
    for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests):
        repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1)
        cl = repo.changelog
        if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'):
            # C version not available
            return

        commands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag)
        # Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not
        # include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make
        # sure both return exactly the same set of gcas.
        for a in cl:
            for b in cl:
                cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b))
                pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b))
                if cgcas != pygcas:
                    print "test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:" % (dag, a, b)
                    print "  C returned:      %s" % cgcas
                    print "  Python returned: %s" % pygcas

def main():
    seed = None
    opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 's:', ['seed='])
    for o, a in opts:
        if o in ('-s', '--seed'):
            seed = long(a, base=0) # accepts base 10 or 16 strings

    if seed is None:
        try:
            seed = long(binascii.hexlify(os.urandom(16)), 16)
        except AttributeError:
            seed = long(time.time() * 1000)

    rng = random.Random(seed)
    test_missingancestors(seed, rng)
    test_lazyancestors()
    test_gca()

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()