view tests/test-journal-exists.t @ 33331:4bae3c117b57

scmutil: make cleanupnodes delete divergent bookmarks

cleanupnodes takes care of bookmark movement, and bookmark movement could
cause bookmark divergent resolution as a side effect. This patch adds such
bookmark divergent resolution logic so future rebase migration will be
easier.

The revset is carefully written to be equivalent to what rebase does today.
Although I think it might make sense to remove divergent bookmarks more
aggressively, for example:

    F   book@1
    |
    E   book@2
    |
    | D book
    | |
    | C
    |/
    B   book@3
    |
    A

When rebase -s C -d E, "book@1" will be removed, "book@3" will be kept,
and the end result is:

    D   book
    |
    C
    |
    F
    |
    E   book@2 (?)
    |
    B   book@3
    |
    A

The question is should we keep book@2? The current logic keeps it. If we
choose not to (makes some sense to me), the "deleterevs" revset could be
simplified to "newnode % oldnode".

For now, I just make it compatible with the existing behavior. If we want to
make the "deleterevs" revset simpler, we can always do it in the future.

  $ hg init
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am0
  adding a

  $ hg -q clone . foo

  $ touch .hg/store/journal

  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg ci -Am0
  abort: abandoned transaction found!
  (run 'hg recover' to clean up transaction)
  [255]

  $ hg recover
  rolling back interrupted transaction
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

Check that zero-size journals are correctly aborted:

#if unix-permissions no-root
  $ hg bundle -qa repo.hg
  $ chmod -w foo/.hg/store/00changelog.i

  $ hg -R foo unbundle repo.hg
  adding changesets
  abort: Permission denied: $TESTTMP/foo/.hg/store/.00changelog.i-* (glob)
  [255]

  $ if test -f foo/.hg/store/journal; then echo 'journal exists :-('; fi
#endif