largefiles: remove meaningless code path for "hg pull --rebase"
This patch removes "--rebase" specific code path for "hg pull" in
"overridepull", because previous patch makes it meaningless: now,
"rebase.rebase" ("orig" invocation in this patch) can
update/commit largefiles safely without "repo._isrebasing = True".
As a side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation in
"overridepull", this patch removes "nothing to rebase ..." message in
"test-largefiles.t", which is shown only when rebase extension is
enabled AFTER largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull" at
first, because rebase wraps "hg pull" later
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig",
even though rebase assumes that "orig" is "pull" of commands
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" directly
3.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
3.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent "Y" on "X"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. "pullrebase" tries to rebase, but there is nothing to be done,
because "Y" is already rebased on "X". then, it shows "nothing
to rebase ..."
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull"
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig"
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" as "orig"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. revision "Y" is not yet rebased, so "pullrebase" doesn't shows
"nothing to rebase ..."
As another side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation, this
patch fixes issue3861, which occurs only when rebase extension is
enabled BEFORE largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first,
because largefiles wrap "hg pull" later
2. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" explicitly
2.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
2.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent, but fails because
no revision is checked out in issue3861 case
3. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 1 returned
from "rebase" at (2.2)
4. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 1 unexpectedly
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first
2. "overridepull" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "orig"
3. "pullrebase" invokes "pull" as "orig"
4. "pullrebase" invokes "rebase", and it fails
5. "pullrebase" returns to "overridepull" with exit code 0
(because "pullrebase" ignores result of "pull" and "rebase")
6. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 0 returned
from "rebase" at (5)
7. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 0
$ cat > writepatterns.py <<EOF
> import sys
>
> path = sys.argv[1]
> patterns = sys.argv[2:]
>
> fp = file(path, 'wb')
> for pattern in patterns:
> count = int(pattern[0:-1])
> char = pattern[-1] + '\n'
> fp.write(char*count)
> fp.close()
> EOF
prepare repo
$ hg init a
$ cd a
These initial lines of Xs were not in the original file used to generate
the patch. So all the patch hunks need to be applied to a constant offset
within this file. If the offset isn't tracked then the hunks can be
applied to the wrong lines of this file.
$ python ../writepatterns.py a 34X 10A 1B 10A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 10A 1E 10A 1B 10A
$ hg commit -Am adda
adding a
This is a cleaner patch generated via diff
In this case it reproduces the problem when
the output of hg export does not
import patch
$ hg import -v -m 'b' -d '2 0' - <<EOF
> --- a/a 2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
> +++ b/a 2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> EOF
applying patch from stdin
patching file a
Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset 34 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 (offset 34 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 109 (offset 34 lines).
a
created 189885cecb41
compare imported changes against reference file
$ python ../writepatterns.py aref 34X 10A 1B 1a 9A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 1a 9A 1E 10A 1B 1a 9A
$ diff aref a
$ cd ..