rebase: do not invent successor to skipped changeset
When rebase results in an empty a changeset it is "skipped" and no related
changeset is created at all. When we added obsolescence support to rebase (in
fc2a6114f0a0) it seemed a good idea to use its parent successor as the
successors for such dropped changesets. (see old version of the altered test).
This option was chosen because it seems a good way to hint about were the
dropped changeset "intended" to be. Such hint would have been used by automatic
evolution mechanism to rebase potential unstable children.
However, field testing of this version are not conclusive. It very often leads
to the creation of (totally unfounded) evolution divergence. This changeset
changes this behavior and mark skipped changesets as pruned (obsolete without
successors). This prevents the issue and seems semantically better probably a
win for obsolescence reading tool.
See example bellow for details:
User Babar has five changesets of interest:
- O, its current base of development.
- U, the new upstream
- A and C, some development changesets
- B another development changeset independent from A
O - A - B - C
\
U
Babar decides that B is more critical than the A and C and rebase it first
$ hg rebase --rev B --dest U
B is now obsolete (in lower case bellow). Rebase result, B', is its
successors.(note, C is unstable)
O - A - b - C
\
U - B'
Babar is now done with B', and want to rebase the rest of its history:
$ hg rebase --source A --dest B'
hg rebase process A, B and C. B is skipped as all its changes are already contained
in B'.
O - U - B' - A' - C'
Babar have the expected result graph wise, obsolescence marker are as follow:
B -> B' (from first rebase)
A -> A' (from second rebase)
C -> C' (from second rebase)
B -> ?? (from second rebase)
Before this changeset, the last marker is `B -> A'`. This cause two issues:
- This is semantically wrong. B have nothing to do with A'
- B has now two successors sets: (B',) and (A',). We detect a divergent
rewriting. The B' and A' are reported as "divergent" to Babar, confusion
ensues. In addition such divergent situation (divergent changeset are children
to each other) is tricky to solve.
With this changeset the last marker is `B -> ΓΈ`:
- This is semantically better.
- B has a single successors set (B',)
This scenario is added to the tests suite.
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo import > port
$ hg add port
$ hg commit -m 0 -u spam -d '0 0'
$ echo export >> port
$ hg commit -m 1 -u eggs -d '1 0'
$ echo export > port
$ echo vaportight >> port
$ echo 'import/export' >> port
$ hg commit -m 2 -u spam -d '2 0'
$ echo 'import/export' >> port
$ hg commit -m 3 -u eggs -d '3 0'
$ head -n 3 port > port1
$ mv port1 port
$ hg commit -m 4 -u spam -d '4 0'
pattern error
$ hg grep '**test**'
grep: invalid match pattern: nothing to repeat
[1]
simple
$ hg grep '.*'
port:4:export
port:4:vaportight
port:4:import/export
$ hg grep port port
port:4:export
port:4:vaportight
port:4:import/export
simple with color
$ hg --config extensions.color= grep --config color.mode=ansi \
> --color=always port port
\x1b[0;35mport\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0m\x1b[0;32m4\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0mex\x1b[0;31;1mport\x1b[0m (esc)
\x1b[0;35mport\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0m\x1b[0;32m4\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0mva\x1b[0;31;1mport\x1b[0might (esc)
\x1b[0;35mport\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0m\x1b[0;32m4\x1b[0m\x1b[0;36m:\x1b[0mim\x1b[0;31;1mport\x1b[0m/export (esc)
all
$ hg grep --traceback --all -nu port port
port:4:4:-:spam:import/export
port:3:4:+:eggs:import/export
port:2:1:-:spam:import
port:2:2:-:spam:export
port:2:1:+:spam:export
port:2:2:+:spam:vaportight
port:2:3:+:spam:import/export
port:1:2:+:eggs:export
port:0:1:+:spam:import
other
$ hg grep -l port port
port:4
$ hg grep import port
port:4:import/export
$ hg cp port port2
$ hg commit -m 4 -u spam -d '5 0'
follow
$ hg grep --traceback -f 'import\n\Z' port2
port:0:import
$ echo deport >> port2
$ hg commit -m 5 -u eggs -d '6 0'
$ hg grep -f --all -nu port port2
port2:6:4:+:eggs:deport
port:4:4:-:spam:import/export
port:3:4:+:eggs:import/export
port:2:1:-:spam:import
port:2:2:-:spam:export
port:2:1:+:spam:export
port:2:2:+:spam:vaportight
port:2:3:+:spam:import/export
port:1:2:+:eggs:export
port:0:1:+:spam:import
$ cd ..
$ hg init t2
$ cd t2
$ hg grep foobar foo
[1]
$ hg grep foobar
[1]
$ echo blue >> color
$ echo black >> color
$ hg add color
$ hg ci -m 0
$ echo orange >> color
$ hg ci -m 1
$ echo black > color
$ hg ci -m 2
$ echo orange >> color
$ echo blue >> color
$ hg ci -m 3
$ hg grep orange
color:3:orange
$ hg grep --all orange
color:3:+:orange
color:2:-:orange
color:1:+:orange
match in last "line" without newline
$ python -c 'fp = open("noeol", "wb"); fp.write("no infinite loop"); fp.close();'
$ hg ci -Amnoeol
adding noeol
$ hg grep loop
noeol:4:no infinite loop
$ cd ..
Issue685: trackback in grep -r after rename
Got a traceback when using grep on a single
revision with renamed files.
$ hg init issue685
$ cd issue685
$ echo octarine > color
$ hg ci -Amcolor
adding color
$ hg rename color colour
$ hg ci -Am rename
$ hg grep octarine
colour:1:octarine
color:0:octarine
Used to crash here
$ hg grep -r 1 octarine
colour:1:octarine
$ cd ..
Issue337: test that grep follows parent-child relationships instead
of just using revision numbers.
$ hg init issue337
$ cd issue337
$ echo white > color
$ hg commit -A -m "0 white"
adding color
$ echo red > color
$ hg commit -A -m "1 red"
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo black > color
$ hg commit -A -m "2 black"
created new head
$ hg update --clean 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo blue > color
$ hg commit -A -m "3 blue"
$ hg grep --all red
color:3:-:red
color:1:+:red
$ cd ..
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ cp "$TESTDIR/binfile.bin" .
$ hg add binfile.bin
$ hg ci -m 'add binfile.bin'
$ hg grep "MaCam" --all
binfile.bin:0:+: Binary file matches
$ cd ..