tests/test-pending.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org>
Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:15:32 +0100
changeset 18444 55aff0c2b73c
parent 16975 921458360270
child 24822 8678b1eafbcf
permissions -rw-r--r--
rebase: do not invent successor to skipped changeset When rebase results in an empty a changeset it is "skipped" and no related changeset is created at all. When we added obsolescence support to rebase (in fc2a6114f0a0) it seemed a good idea to use its parent successor as the successors for such dropped changesets. (see old version of the altered test). This option was chosen because it seems a good way to hint about were the dropped changeset "intended" to be. Such hint would have been used by automatic evolution mechanism to rebase potential unstable children. However, field testing of this version are not conclusive. It very often leads to the creation of (totally unfounded) evolution divergence. This changeset changes this behavior and mark skipped changesets as pruned (obsolete without successors). This prevents the issue and seems semantically better probably a win for obsolescence reading tool. See example bellow for details: User Babar has five changesets of interest: - O, its current base of development. - U, the new upstream - A and C, some development changesets - B another development changeset independent from A O - A - B - C \ U Babar decides that B is more critical than the A and C and rebase it first $ hg rebase --rev B --dest U B is now obsolete (in lower case bellow). Rebase result, B', is its successors.(note, C is unstable) O - A - b - C \ U - B' Babar is now done with B', and want to rebase the rest of its history: $ hg rebase --source A --dest B' hg rebase process A, B and C. B is skipped as all its changes are already contained in B'. O - U - B' - A' - C' Babar have the expected result graph wise, obsolescence marker are as follow: B -> B' (from first rebase) A -> A' (from second rebase) C -> C' (from second rebase) B -> ?? (from second rebase) Before this changeset, the last marker is `B -> A'`. This cause two issues: - This is semantically wrong. B have nothing to do with A' - B has now two successors sets: (B',) and (A',). We detect a divergent rewriting. The B' and A' are reported as "divergent" to Babar, confusion ensues. In addition such divergent situation (divergent changeset are children to each other) is tricky to solve. With this changeset the last marker is `B -> ΓΈ`: - This is semantically better. - B has a single successors set (B',) This scenario is added to the tests suite.

Verify that pending changesets are seen by pretxn* hooks but not by other
processes that access the destination repo while the hooks are running.

The hooks (python and external) both reject changesets after some think time,
during which another process runs pull.  Each hook creates a file ('notify') to
indicate to the controlling process that it is running; the process removes the
file to indicate the hook can terminate.

init env vars

  $ d=`pwd`
  $ maxwait=20

utility to run the test - start a push in the background and run pull

  $ dotest() {
  >     rm -f notify
  >     printf 'push '; hg -R child-push tip --template '{node}\n'
  >     hg -R child-push -q push > push.out 2>&1 &
  > 
  >     # wait for hook to create the notify file
  >     i=$maxwait
  >     while [ ! -f notify -a $i != 0 ]; do
  >         sleep 1
  >         i=`expr $i - 1`
  >     done
  > 
  >     # run pull
  >     hg -R child-pull -q pull
  >     rc=$?
  > 
  >     # tell hook to finish; notify should exist.
  >     rm notify
  >     wait
  > 
  >     cat push.out
  >     printf 'pull '; hg -R child-pull tip --template '{node}\n'
  >     return $rc
  > }

python hook

  $ cat <<EOF > reject.py
  > import os, time
  > from mercurial import ui, localrepo
  > def rejecthook(ui, repo, hooktype, node, **opts):
  >     ui.write('hook %s\\n' % repo['tip'].hex())
  >     # create the notify file so caller knows we're running
  >     fpath = os.path.join('$d', 'notify')
  >     f = open(fpath, 'w')
  >     f.close()
  >     # wait for ack - caller should delete the notify file
  >     i = $maxwait
  >     while os.path.exists(fpath) and i > 0:
  >         time.sleep(1)
  >         i -= 1
  >     return True # reject the changesets
  > EOF

external hook

  $ cat <<EOF > reject.sh
  > printf 'hook '; hg tip --template '{node}\\n'
  > # create the notify file so caller knows we're running
  > fpath=$d/notify
  > touch \$fpath
  > # wait for ack - caller should delete the notify file
  > i=$maxwait
  > while [ -f \$fpath -a \$i != 0 ]; do
  >     sleep 1
  >     i=\`expr \$i - 1\`
  > done
  > exit 1 # reject the changesets
  > EOF

create repos

  $ hg init parent
  $ hg clone -q parent child-push
  $ hg clone -q parent child-pull
  $ echo a > child-push/a
  $ hg -R child-push add child-push/a
  $ hg -R child-push commit -m a -d '1000000 0'

test python hook

  $ cat <<EOF > parent/.hg/hgrc
  > [extensions]
  > reject = $d/reject.py
  > [hooks]
  > pretxnchangegroup = python:reject.rejecthook
  > EOF

  $ dotest
  push 29b62aeb769fdf78d8d9c5f28b017f76d7ef824b
  hook 29b62aeb769fdf78d8d9c5f28b017f76d7ef824b
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: pretxnchangegroup hook failed
  pull 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000

test external hook

  $ cat <<EOF > parent/.hg/hgrc
  > [hooks]
  > pretxnchangegroup = sh $d/reject.sh
  > EOF

  $ dotest
  push 29b62aeb769fdf78d8d9c5f28b017f76d7ef824b
  hook 29b62aeb769fdf78d8d9c5f28b017f76d7ef824b
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: pretxnchangegroup hook exited with status 1
  pull 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000