obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange
Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an
obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the
incoming obsolescence stream.
Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but
they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless
and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink>
anyway.
Test document extraction
$ "$TESTDIR/hghave" docutils || exit 80
$ HGENCODING=UTF-8
$ export HGENCODING
$ { echo C; find "$TESTDIR/../i18n" -name "*.po" | sort; } | while read PO; do
> LOCALE=`basename "$PO" .po`
> echo
> echo "% extracting documentation from $LOCALE"
> echo ".. -*- coding: utf-8 -*-" > gendoc-$LOCALE.txt
> echo "" >> gendoc-$LOCALE.txt
> LANGUAGE=$LOCALE python "$TESTDIR/../doc/gendoc.py" >> gendoc-$LOCALE.txt 2> /dev/null || exit
>
> if [ $LOCALE != C ]; then
> cmp -s gendoc-C.txt gendoc-$LOCALE.txt && echo '** NOTHING TRANSLATED **'
> fi
>
> # We call runrst without adding "--halt warning" to make it report
> # all errors instead of stopping on the first one.
> echo "checking for parse errors"
> python "$TESTDIR/../doc/runrst" html gendoc-$LOCALE.txt /dev/null
> done
% extracting documentation from C
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from da
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from de
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from el
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from fr
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from it
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from ja
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from pt_BR
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from ro
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from ru
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from sv
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from zh_CN
checking for parse errors
% extracting documentation from zh_TW
checking for parse errors