tests/test-issue1089.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org>
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:31:58 -0500
changeset 20030 5931489b65e0
parent 16913 f2719b387380
child 26420 2fc86d92c4a9
permissions -rw-r--r--
obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the incoming obsolescence stream. Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink> anyway.

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue1089

  $ hg init
  $ mkdir a
  $ echo a > a/b
  $ hg ci -Am m
  adding a/b

  $ hg rm a
  removing a/b (glob)
  $ hg ci -m m a

  $ mkdir a b
  $ echo a > a/b
  $ hg ci -Am m
  adding a/b

  $ hg rm a
  removing a/b (glob)
  $ cd b

Relative delete:

  $ hg ci -m m ../a

  $ cd ..