obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange
Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an
obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the
incoming obsolescence stream.
Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but
they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless
and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink>
anyway.
Test for changeset 9fe267f77f56ff127cf7e65dc15dd9de71ce8ceb
(merge correctly when all the files in a directory are moved
but then local changes are added in the same directory)
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ mkdir -p testdir
$ echo a > testdir/a
$ hg add testdir/a
$ hg commit -m a
$ cd ..
$ hg clone a b
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd a
$ echo alpha > testdir/a
$ hg commit -m remote-change
$ cd ..
$ cd b
$ mkdir testdir/subdir
$ hg mv testdir/a testdir/subdir/a
$ hg commit -m move
$ mkdir newdir
$ echo beta > newdir/beta
$ hg add newdir/beta
$ hg commit -m local-addition
$ hg pull ../a
pulling from ../a
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg up -C 2
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge
merging testdir/subdir/a and testdir/a to testdir/subdir/a
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg stat
M testdir/subdir/a
$ hg diff --nodates
diff -r bc21c9773bfa testdir/subdir/a
--- a/testdir/subdir/a
+++ b/testdir/subdir/a
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-a
+alpha
$ cd ..