obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange
Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an
obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the
incoming obsolescence stream.
Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but
they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless
and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink>
anyway.
$ hg init
$ echo This is file a1 > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m "commit #0"
$ echo This is file b1 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "commit #1"
$ hg update 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo This is file c1 > c
$ hg add c
$ hg commit -m "commit #2"
created new head
$ hg merge 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ rm b
$ echo This is file c22 > c
Test hg behaves when committing with a missing file added by a merge
$ hg commit -m "commit #3"
abort: cannot commit merge with missing files
[255]