contrib/revsetbenchmarks.txt
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:04:51 -0700
changeset 24438 5b85a5bc5bbb
parent 22557 ace8320156ef
child 24923 e5f166961123
permissions -rw-r--r--
revert: evaluate filesets against working directory (issue4497) As the failing revert tests in test-fileset-generated.t show, Revert currently creates one matcher for matching files in the working copy and another matcher for matching files in the target revision. The two matchers are created with different contexts, which means filesets are evaluated differently. Then the union of the sets of files matching the matchers in the two contexts are reverted. It doesn't seem to make sense to use two different matchers; only the context they're applied to should be different. It seems very likely that the user wants the filesets to be evaluated against the working directory, which the tests test-fileset-generated.t also assume, so let's make it so. I willingly admit that the largefiles code was modified by trial and error (according to tests).

all()
draft()
::tip
draft() and ::tip
::tip and draft()
0::tip
roots(0::tip)
author(lmoscovicz)
author(mpm)
author(lmoscovicz) or author(mpm)
author(mpm) or author(lmoscovicz)
tip:0
max(tip:0)
min(0:tip)
0::
min(0::)
# those two `roots(...)` inputs are close to what phase movement use.
roots((tip~100::) - (tip~100::tip))
roots((0::) - (0::tip))
::p1(p1(tip))::
public()
:10000 and public()
draft()
:10000 and draft()
max(::(tip~20) - obsolete())
roots((0:tip)::)
(not public() - obsolete())
(_intlist('20000\x0020001')) and merge()
parents(20000)
(20000::) - (20000)
# The one below is used by rebase
(children(ancestor(tip~5, tip)) and ::(tip~5))::