tests/test-bundle2-pushback.t

rebase: remove complex unhiding code

This is similar to Martin von Zweigbergk's previous patch [1].

Previous patches are adding more `.unfiltered()` to the rebase code. So I
wonder: are we playing whack-a-mole regarding on `unfiltered()` in rebase?

Thinking about it, I believe most of the rebase code *should* just use an
unfiltered repo. The only exception is before we figuring out a
`rebasestate`. This patch makes it so. See added comment in code for why
that's more reasonable.

This would make the code base cleaner (not mangling the `repo` object),
faster (no need to invalidate caches), simpler (less LOC), less error-prone
(no need to think about what to unhide, ex. should we unhide wdir p2? how
about destinations?), and future proof (other code may change visibility in
an unexpected way, ex.  directaccess may make the destination only visible
when it's in "--dest" revset tree).

[1]: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-March/094277.html

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D644

  $ cat > bundle2.py << EOF
  > """A small extension to test bundle2 pushback parts.
  > Current bundle2 implementation doesn't provide a way to generate those
  > parts, so they must be created by extensions.
  > """
  > from __future__ import absolute_import
  > from mercurial import bundle2, exchange, pushkey, util
  > def _newhandlechangegroup(op, inpart):
  >     """This function wraps the changegroup part handler for getbundle.
  >     It issues an additional pushkey part to send a new
  >     bookmark back to the client"""
  >     result = bundle2.handlechangegroup(op, inpart)
  >     if 'pushback' in op.reply.capabilities:
  >         params = {'namespace': 'bookmarks',
  >                   'key': 'new-server-mark',
  >                   'old': '',
  >                   'new': 'tip'}
  >         encodedparams = [(k, pushkey.encode(v)) for (k,v) in params.items()]
  >         op.reply.newpart('pushkey', mandatoryparams=encodedparams)
  >     else:
  >         op.reply.newpart('output', data='pushback not enabled')
  >     return result
  > _newhandlechangegroup.params = bundle2.handlechangegroup.params
  > bundle2.parthandlermapping['changegroup'] = _newhandlechangegroup
  > EOF

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [ui]
  > ssh = $PYTHON "$TESTDIR/dummyssh"
  > username = nobody <[e-mail]>
  > 
  > [alias]
  > tglog = log -G -T "{desc} [{phase}:{node|short}]"
  > EOF

Set up server repository

  $ hg init server
  $ cd server
  $ echo c0 > f0
  $ hg commit -Am 0
  adding f0

Set up client repository

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/server client -q
  $ cd client

Enable extension
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > bundle2=$TESTTMP/bundle2.py
  > EOF

Without config

  $ cd ../client
  $ echo c1 > f1
  $ hg commit -Am 1
  adding f1
  $ hg push
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/server
  searching for changes
  remote: adding changesets
  remote: adding manifests
  remote: adding file changes
  remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  remote: pushback not enabled
  $ hg bookmark
  no bookmarks set

  $ cd ../server
  $ hg tglog
  o  1 [public:2b9c7234e035]
  |
  @  0 [public:6cee5c8f3e5b]
  



With config

  $ cd ../client
  $ echo '[experimental]' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo 'bundle2.pushback = True' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo c2 > f2
  $ hg commit -Am 2
  adding f2
  $ hg push
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/server
  searching for changes
  remote: adding changesets
  remote: adding manifests
  remote: adding file changes
  remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  $ hg bookmark
     new-server-mark           2:0a76dfb2e179

  $ cd ../server
  $ hg tglog
  o  2 [public:0a76dfb2e179]
  |
  o  1 [public:2b9c7234e035]
  |
  @  0 [public:6cee5c8f3e5b]