tests/test-sparse-fsmonitor.t
author Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:13:04 -0700
changeset 34109 5d45a997d11d
parent 33289 abd7dedbaa36
permissions -rw-r--r--
rebase: remove complex unhiding code This is similar to Martin von Zweigbergk's previous patch [1]. Previous patches are adding more `.unfiltered()` to the rebase code. So I wonder: are we playing whack-a-mole regarding on `unfiltered()` in rebase? Thinking about it, I believe most of the rebase code *should* just use an unfiltered repo. The only exception is before we figuring out a `rebasestate`. This patch makes it so. See added comment in code for why that's more reasonable. This would make the code base cleaner (not mangling the `repo` object), faster (no need to invalidate caches), simpler (less LOC), less error-prone (no need to think about what to unhide, ex. should we unhide wdir p2? how about destinations?), and future proof (other code may change visibility in an unexpected way, ex. directaccess may make the destination only visible when it's in "--dest" revset tree). [1]: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-March/094277.html Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D644

This test doesn't yet work due to the way fsmonitor is integrated with test runner

  $ exit 80

test sparse interaction with other extensions

  $ hg init myrepo
  $ cd myrepo
  $ cat > .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > sparse=
  > strip=
  > EOF

Test fsmonitor integration (if available)
TODO: make fully isolated integration test a'la https://github.com/facebook/watchman/blob/master/tests/integration/WatchmanInstance.py
(this one is using the systemwide watchman instance)

  $ touch .watchmanconfig
  $ echo "ignoredir1/" >> .hgignore
  $ hg commit -Am ignoredir1
  adding .hgignore
  $ echo "ignoredir2/" >> .hgignore
  $ hg commit -m ignoredir2

  $ hg sparse --reset
  $ hg sparse -I ignoredir1 -I ignoredir2 -I dir1

  $ mkdir ignoredir1 ignoredir2 dir1
  $ touch ignoredir1/file ignoredir2/file dir1/file

Run status twice to compensate for a condition in fsmonitor where it will check
ignored files the second time it runs, regardless of previous state (ask @sid0)
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file

Test that fsmonitor ignore hash check updates when .hgignore changes

  $ hg up -q ".^"
  $ hg status --config extensions.fsmonitor=
  ? dir1/file
  ? ignoredir2/file