rebase: remove complex unhiding code
This is similar to Martin von Zweigbergk's previous patch [1].
Previous patches are adding more `.unfiltered()` to the rebase code. So I
wonder: are we playing whack-a-mole regarding on `unfiltered()` in rebase?
Thinking about it, I believe most of the rebase code *should* just use an
unfiltered repo. The only exception is before we figuring out a
`rebasestate`. This patch makes it so. See added comment in code for why
that's more reasonable.
This would make the code base cleaner (not mangling the `repo` object),
faster (no need to invalidate caches), simpler (less LOC), less error-prone
(no need to think about what to unhide, ex. should we unhide wdir p2? how
about destinations?), and future proof (other code may change visibility in
an unexpected way, ex. directaccess may make the destination only visible
when it's in "--dest" revset tree).
[1]: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-March/094277.html
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D644
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo 123 > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m "a" -u a
$ cd ..
$ hg init b
$ cd b
$ echo 321 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "b" -u b
$ hg pull ../a
pulling from ../a
searching for changes
abort: repository is unrelated
[255]
$ hg pull -f ../a
pulling from ../a
searching for changes
warning: repository is unrelated
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg heads
changeset: 1:9a79c33a9db3
tag: tip
parent: -1:000000000000
user: a
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
changeset: 0:01f8062b2de5
user: b
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: b
$ cd ..