merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user
whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or
keep the remote revision.
Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had
changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For
example:
- You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the
parent subrepo files.
- Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not
supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means
choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This
is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs,
etc).
This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios.
Notes:
- The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not
interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action).
- This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set.
- I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e.
to force the test to choose those options).
# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com>
# Date 1378420708 -7200
# Fri Sep 06 00:38:28 2013 +0200
# Node ID 2fb9cb0c7b26303ac3178b7739975e663075857d
# Parent 50d721553198cea51c30f53b76d41dc919280097
merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user
whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or
keep the remote revision.
Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had
changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For
example:
- You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the
parent subrepo files.
- Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not
supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means
choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This
is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs,
etc).
This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios.
Notes:
- The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not
interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action).
- This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set.
- I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e.
to force the test to choose those options).
$ cat > correct.py <<EOF
> def toto(arg1, arg2):
> del arg2
> return (5 + 6, 9)
> EOF
$ cat > wrong.py <<EOF
> def toto( arg1, arg2):
> del(arg2)
> return ( 5+6, 9)
> EOF
$ cat > quote.py <<EOF
> # let's use quote in comments
> (''' ( 4x5 )
> but """\\''' and finally''',
> """let's fool checkpatch""", '1+2',
> '"""', 42+1, """and
> ( 4-1 ) """, "( 1+1 )\" and ")
> a, '\\\\\\\\', "\\\\\\" x-2", "c-1"
> EOF
$ cat > non-py24.py <<EOF
> # Using builtins that does not exist in Python 2.4
> if any():
> x = all()
> y = format(x)
> # next(generator) is new in 2.6
> z = next(x)
> # but generator.next() is okay
> x.next()
> # and we can make our own next
> def next(stuff):
> pass
>
> # Do not complain about our own definition
> def any(x):
> pass
>
> # try/except/finally block does not exist in Python 2.4
> try:
> pass
> except StandardError, inst:
> pass
> finally:
> pass
>
> # nested try/finally+try/except is allowed
> try:
> try:
> pass
> except StandardError, inst:
> pass
> finally:
> pass
>
> # yield inside a try/finally block is not allowed in Python 2.4
> try:
> pass
> yield 1
> finally:
> pass
> try:
> yield
> pass
> finally:
> pass
>
> EOF
$ cat > classstyle.py <<EOF
> class newstyle_class(object):
> pass
>
> class oldstyle_class:
> pass
>
> class empty():
> pass
>
> no_class = 1:
> pass
> EOF
$ check_code="$TESTDIR"/../contrib/check-code.py
$ "$check_code" ./wrong.py ./correct.py ./quote.py ./non-py24.py ./classstyle.py
./wrong.py:1:
> def toto( arg1, arg2):
gratuitous whitespace in () or []
./wrong.py:2:
> del(arg2)
Python keyword is not a function
./wrong.py:3:
> return ( 5+6, 9)
gratuitous whitespace in () or []
missing whitespace in expression
./quote.py:5:
> '"""', 42+1, """and
missing whitespace in expression
./non-py24.py:2:
> if any():
any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
./non-py24.py:3:
> x = all()
any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
./non-py24.py:4:
> y = format(x)
any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
./non-py24.py:6:
> z = next(x)
no next(foo) in Python 2.4 and 2.5, use foo.next() instead
./non-py24.py:18:
> try:
no try/except/finally in Python 2.4
./non-py24.py:35:
> try:
no yield inside try/finally in Python 2.4
./non-py24.py:40:
> try:
no yield inside try/finally in Python 2.4
./classstyle.py:4:
> class oldstyle_class:
old-style class, use class foo(object)
./classstyle.py:7:
> class empty():
class foo() not available in Python 2.4, use class foo(object)
[1]
$ cat > python3-compat.py << EOF
> foo <> bar
> reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
> EOF
$ "$check_code" python3-compat.py
python3-compat.py:1:
> foo <> bar
<> operator is not available in Python 3+, use !=
python3-compat.py:2:
> reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
reduce is not available in Python 3+
[1]
$ cat > is-op.py <<EOF
> # is-operator comparing number or string literal
> x = None
> y = x is 'foo'
> y = x is "foo"
> y = x is 5346
> y = x is -6
> y = x is not 'foo'
> y = x is not "foo"
> y = x is not 5346
> y = x is not -6
> EOF
$ "$check_code" ./is-op.py
./is-op.py:3:
> y = x is 'foo'
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:4:
> y = x is "foo"
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:5:
> y = x is 5346
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:6:
> y = x is -6
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:7:
> y = x is not 'foo'
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:8:
> y = x is not "foo"
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:9:
> y = x is not 5346
object comparison with literal
./is-op.py:10:
> y = x is not -6
object comparison with literal
[1]
$ cat > for-nolineno.py <<EOF
> except:
> EOF
$ "$check_code" for-nolineno.py --nolineno
for-nolineno.py:0:
> except:
naked except clause
[1]
$ cat > warning.t <<EOF
> $ function warnonly {
> > }
> EOF
$ "$check_code" warning.t
$ "$check_code" --warn warning.t
warning.t:1:
> $ function warnonly {
warning: don't use 'function', use old style
[1]
$ cat > raise-format.py <<EOF
> raise SomeException, message
> # this next line is okay
> raise SomeException(arg1, arg2)
> EOF
$ "$check_code" not-existing.py raise-format.py
Skipping*not-existing.py* (glob)
raise-format.py:1:
> raise SomeException, message
don't use old-style two-argument raise, use Exception(message)
[1]