merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user
whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or
keep the remote revision.
Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had
changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For
example:
- You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the
parent subrepo files.
- Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not
supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means
choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This
is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs,
etc).
This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios.
Notes:
- The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not
interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action).
- This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set.
- I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e.
to force the test to choose those options).
# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com>
# Date 1378420708 -7200
# Fri Sep 06 00:38:28 2013 +0200
# Node ID 2fb9cb0c7b26303ac3178b7739975e663075857d
# Parent 50d721553198cea51c30f53b76d41dc919280097
merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user
whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or
keep the remote revision.
Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had
changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For
example:
- You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the
parent subrepo files.
- Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not
supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means
choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This
is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs,
etc).
This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios.
Notes:
- The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not
interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action).
- This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set.
- I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e.
to force the test to choose those options).
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue672
# 0-2-4
# \ \ \
# 1-3-5
#
# rename in #1, content change in #4.
$ hg init
$ touch 1
$ touch 2
$ hg commit -Am init # 0
adding 1
adding 2
$ hg rename 1 1a
$ hg commit -m rename # 1
$ hg co -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo unrelated >> 2
$ hg ci -m unrelated1 # 2
created new head
$ hg merge --debug 1
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a'
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 81f4b099af3d, local: c64f439569a9+, remote: c12dcd37c90a
1: other deleted -> r
1a: remote created -> g
removing 1
updating: 1 1/2 files (50.00%)
getting 1a
updating: 1a 2/2 files (100.00%)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -m merge1 # 3
$ hg co -C 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo hello >> 1
$ hg ci -m unrelated2 # 4
created new head
$ hg co -C 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge -y --debug 4
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: c64f439569a9, local: e327dca35ac8+, remote: 746e9549ea96
1a: local copied/moved to 1 -> m
preserving 1a for resolve of 1a
updating: 1a 1/1 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for 1a (binary False symlink False)
merging 1a and 1 to 1a
my 1a@e327dca35ac8+ other 1@746e9549ea96 ancestor 1@81f4b099af3d
premerge successful
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg co -C 4
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge -y --debug 3
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: c64f439569a9, local: 746e9549ea96+, remote: e327dca35ac8
1: remote moved to 1a -> m
preserving 1 for resolve of 1a
removing 1
updating: 1 1/1 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for 1a (binary False symlink False)
merging 1 and 1a to 1a
my 1a@746e9549ea96+ other 1a@e327dca35ac8 ancestor 1@81f4b099af3d
premerge successful
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)