view tests/test-push-checkheads-superceed-A5.t @ 36563:5faeabb07cf5

debugcommands: support for triggering push protocol

The mechanism for pushing to a remote is a bit more complicated
than other commands. On SSH, we wait for a positive reply from
the server before we start sending the bundle payload.

This commit adds a mechanism to the "command" action in
`hg debugwireproto` to trigger the "push protocol" and to
specify a file whose contents should be submitted as the command
payload.

With this new feature, we implement a handful of tests for the
"unbundle" command. We try to cover various server failures and
hook/output scenarios so protocol behavior is as comprehensively
tested as possible. Even with so much test output, we only cover
bundle1 with Python hooks. There's still a lot of test coverage
that needs to be implemented. But this is certainly a good start.

Because there are so many new tests, we split these tests into their
own test file.

In order to make output deterministic, we need to disable the
doublepipe primitive. We add an option to `hg debugwireproto`
to do that. Because something in the bowels of the peer does a
read of stderr, we still capture read I/O from stderr. So there
is test coverage of what the server emits.

The tests around I/O capture some wonkiness. For example,
interleaved ui.write() and ui.write_err() calls are emitted in
order. However, (presumably due to buffering), print() to
sys.stdout and sys.stderr aren't in order.

We currently only test bundle1 because bundle2 is substantially
harder to test because it is more complicated (the server responds
with a stream containing a bundle2 instead of a frame).

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2471

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case A-5
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another.
TestCase 5: New changeset as parent of the successor

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1-changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 2rchangeset branch, head is a successor, but other is new
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠◔ A'
..     | |
..     | ◔ B
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir A5
  $ cd A5
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ mkcommit A1
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  ba93660aff8d (draft): A1
  |
  o  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/A5/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..