exchange: use the postclose API on transaction
As with changegroup, we should wait for the transaction to be really closed
before scheduling hook execution.
from mercurial import ancestor, commands, hg, ui, util
# graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph:
# o 13
# |
# | o 12
# | |
# | | o 11
# | | |\
# | | | | o 10
# | | | | |
# | o---+ | 9
# | | | | |
# o | | | | 8
# / / / /
# | | o | 7
# | | | |
# o---+ | 6
# / / /
# | | o 5
# | |/
# | o 4
# | |
# o | 3
# | |
# | o 2
# |/
# o 1
# |
# o 0
graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4],
7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9],
13: [8]}
pfunc = graph.get
class mockchangelog(object):
parentrevs = graph.get
def runmissingancestors(revs, bases):
print "%% ancestors of %s and not of %s" % (revs, bases)
print ancestor.missingancestors(revs, bases, pfunc)
def test_missingancestors():
# Empty revs
runmissingancestors([], [1])
runmissingancestors([], [])
# If bases is empty, it's the same as if it were [nullrev]
runmissingancestors([12], [])
# Trivial case: revs == bases
runmissingancestors([0], [0])
runmissingancestors([4, 5, 6], [6, 5, 4])
# With nullrev
runmissingancestors([-1], [12])
runmissingancestors([12], [-1])
# 9 is a parent of 12. 7 is a parent of 9, so an ancestor of 12. 6 is an
# ancestor of 12 but not of 7.
runmissingancestors([12], [9])
runmissingancestors([9], [12])
runmissingancestors([12, 9], [7])
runmissingancestors([7, 6], [12])
# More complex cases
runmissingancestors([10], [11, 12])
runmissingancestors([11], [10])
runmissingancestors([11], [10, 12])
runmissingancestors([12], [10])
runmissingancestors([12], [11])
runmissingancestors([10, 11, 12], [13])
runmissingancestors([13], [10, 11, 12])
def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False):
print ("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" %
(revs, stoprev, inclusive))
return ancestor.lazyancestors(mockchangelog, revs, stoprev=stoprev,
inclusive=inclusive)
def printlazyancestors(s, l):
print [n for n in l if n in s]
def test_lazyancestors():
# Empty revs
s = genlazyancestors([])
printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1])
# Standard example
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13])
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# Standard with ancestry in the initial set (1 is ancestor of 3)
s = genlazyancestors([1, 3])
printlazyancestors(s, [1, -1, 0])
# Including revs
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# Test with stoprev
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of
# DAGs that have been known to be problematic.
dagtests = [
'+2*2*2/*3/2',
'+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2',
]
def test_gca():
u = ui.ui()
for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests):
repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1)
cl = repo.changelog
if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'):
# C version not available
return
commands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag)
# Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not
# include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make
# sure both return exactly the same set of gcas.
for a in cl:
for b in cl:
cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b))
pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b))
if cgcas != pygcas:
print "test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:" % (dag, a, b)
print " C returned: %s" % cgcas
print " Python returned: %s" % pygcas
if __name__ == '__main__':
test_missingancestors()
test_lazyancestors()
test_gca()