tests/test-hghave.t

log: add -L/--line-range option to follow file history by line range

We add an experimental -L/--line-range option to 'hg log' taking file patterns
along with a line range using the (new) FILE,FROMLINE-TOLINE syntax where FILE
may be a pattern (matching exactly one file). The resulting history is similar
to what the "followlines" revset except that, if --patch is specified,
only diff hunks within specified line range are shown.

Basically, this brings the CLI on par with what currently only exists in hgweb
through line selection in "file" and "annotate" views resulting in a file log
with filtered patch to only display followed line range.

The option may be specified multiple times and can be combined with --rev and
regular file patterns to further restrict revisions. Usage of this option
requires --follow; revisions are shown in descending order and renames are
followed. Only the --graph option is currently not supported.

The UI is the result of a consensus from review feedback at:

  https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-October/106749.html


The implementation spreads between commands.log() and cmdutil module.
In commands.log(), the main loop may now use a "hunksfilter" factory (similar
to "filematcher") that, for a given "rev", produces a filtering function
for diff hunks for a given file context object.
The logic to build revisions from -L/--line-range options lives in
cmdutil.getloglinerangerevs() which produces "revs", "filematcher" and
"hunksfilter" information. Revisions obtained by following files' line range
are filtered if they do not match the revset specified by --rev option. If
regular FILE arguments are passed along with -L options, both filematchers are
combined into a new matcher.

.. feature::

   Add an experimental -L/--line-range FILE,FROMLINE-TOLINE option to 'hg log'
   command to follow the history of files by line range. In combination with
   -p/--patch option, only diff hunks within specified line range will be
   displayed. Feedback, especially on UX aspects, is welcome.

  $ . "$TESTDIR/helpers-testrepo.sh"

Testing that hghave does not crash when checking features

  $ hghave --test-features 2>/dev/null

Testing hghave extensibility for third party tools

  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
  > import hghave
  > @hghave.check("custom", "custom hghave feature")
  > def has_custom():
  >     return True
  > EOF

(invocation via run-tests.py)

  $ cat > test-hghaveaddon.t <<EOF
  > #require custom
  >   $ echo foo
  >   foo
  > EOF
  $ ( \
  > testrepohgenv; \
  > $TESTDIR/run-tests.py $HGTEST_RUN_TESTS_PURE test-hghaveaddon.t \
  > )
  .
  # Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failed.

(invocation via command line)

  $ unset TESTDIR
  $ hghave custom

(terminate with exit code 2 at failure of importing hghaveaddon.py)

  $ rm hghaveaddon.*
  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
  > importing this file should cause syntax error
  > EOF

  $ hghave custom
  failed to import hghaveaddon.py from '.': invalid syntax (hghaveaddon.py, line 1)
  [2]