tests/test-issue522.t
author Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com>
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:20:13 -0400
changeset 24305 867c3649be5d
parent 22896 7e9cbb9c6053
child 25125 bd625cd4e5e7
permissions -rw-r--r--
cvsps: use a different tiebreaker to avoid flaky test After adding some sneaky debug printing[0], I determined that this test flaked when a CVS commit containing two files starts too close to the end of a second, thus putting file "a" in one second and "b/c" in the following second. The secondary sort key meant that these changes sorted in a different order when the timestamps were different than they did when they matched. As far as I can tell, CVS walks through the files in a stable order, so by sorting on the filenames in cvsps we'll get stable output. It's fine for us to switch from sorting on the branchpoint as a secondary key because this was already the point when we didn't care, and we're just trying to break ties in a stable way. It's unclear to be if having the branchpoint present matters anymore, but it doesn't really hurt to leave it. With this change in place, I was able to run test-convert-cvs over 650 times in a row without a failure. test-convert-cvcs-synthetic.t appears to still be flaky, but I don't think it's *worse* than it was before - just not better (I observed one flaky failure in 200 runs on that test). 0: The helpful debug hack ended up being this, in case it's useful to future flaky test assassins: --- a/hgext/convert/cvsps.py +++ b/hgext/convert/cvsps.py @@ -854,6 +854,8 @@ def debugcvsps(ui, *args, **opts): ui.write(('Branch: %s\n' % (cs.branch or 'HEAD'))) ui.write(('Tag%s: %s \n' % (['', 's'][len(cs.tags) > 1], ','.join(cs.tags) or '(none)'))) + if cs.comment == 'ci1' and (cs.id == 6) == bool(cs.branchpoints): + ui.write('raw timestamp %r\n' % (cs.date,)) if cs.branchpoints: ui.write(('Branchpoints: %s \n') % ', '.join(sorted(cs.branchpoints)))

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue522

In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'

  $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
  reverting foo
  changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ touch bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     bar
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
   foo: remote is newer -> g
  getting foo
  updating: foo 1/1 files (100.00%)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate | grep foo
  m   0         -2 unset               foo

  $ hg st -A foo
  M foo

  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

  $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
  c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644   foo

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         5       9  .....       1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
       2        14       5  .....       2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)