tests/test-patch.t
author Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com>
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:20:13 -0400
changeset 24305 867c3649be5d
parent 15194 0705f2ac79d6
child 32958 75be14993fda
permissions -rw-r--r--
cvsps: use a different tiebreaker to avoid flaky test After adding some sneaky debug printing[0], I determined that this test flaked when a CVS commit containing two files starts too close to the end of a second, thus putting file "a" in one second and "b/c" in the following second. The secondary sort key meant that these changes sorted in a different order when the timestamps were different than they did when they matched. As far as I can tell, CVS walks through the files in a stable order, so by sorting on the filenames in cvsps we'll get stable output. It's fine for us to switch from sorting on the branchpoint as a secondary key because this was already the point when we didn't care, and we're just trying to break ties in a stable way. It's unclear to be if having the branchpoint present matters anymore, but it doesn't really hurt to leave it. With this change in place, I was able to run test-convert-cvs over 650 times in a row without a failure. test-convert-cvcs-synthetic.t appears to still be flaky, but I don't think it's *worse* than it was before - just not better (I observed one flaky failure in 200 runs on that test). 0: The helpful debug hack ended up being this, in case it's useful to future flaky test assassins: --- a/hgext/convert/cvsps.py +++ b/hgext/convert/cvsps.py @@ -854,6 +854,8 @@ def debugcvsps(ui, *args, **opts): ui.write(('Branch: %s\n' % (cs.branch or 'HEAD'))) ui.write(('Tag%s: %s \n' % (['', 's'][len(cs.tags) > 1], ','.join(cs.tags) or '(none)'))) + if cs.comment == 'ci1' and (cs.id == 6) == bool(cs.branchpoints): + ui.write('raw timestamp %r\n' % (cs.date,)) if cs.branchpoints: ui.write(('Branchpoints: %s \n') % ', '.join(sorted(cs.branchpoints)))

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..