Mercurial > hg-stable
view tests/test-issue522.t @ 23167:a3c2d9211294 stable
templater: don't overwrite the keyword mapping in runsymbol() (issue4362)
This keyword remapping was introduced in e06e9fd2d99f as part of converting
generator based iterators into list based iterators, mentioning "undesired
behavior in template" when a generator is exhausted, but doesn't say what and
introduces no tests.
The problem with the remapping was that it corrupted the output for keywords
like 'extras', 'file_copies' and 'file_copies_switch' in templates such as:
$ hg log -r 142b5d5ec9cc --template "{file_copies % ' File: {file_copy}\n'}"
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
What was happening was that in the first call to runtemplate() inside runmap(),
'lm' mapped the keyword (e.g. file_copies) to the appropriate showxxx() method.
On each subsequent call to runtemplate() in that loop however, the keyword was
mapped to a list of the first item's pieces, e.g.:
'file_copy': ['mercurial/changelog.py', ' (', 'mercurial/hg.py', ')']
Therefore, the dict for the second and any subsequent items were not processed
through the corresponding showxxx() method, and the first item's data was
reused.
The 'extras' keyword regressed in de7e6c489412, and 'file_copies' regressed in
0b241d7a8c62 for other reasons. The common thread of things fixed by this seems
to be when a list of dicts are passed to the templatekw._hybrid class.
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:08:03 -0500 |
parents | 7e9cbb9c6053 |
children | bd625cd4e5e7 |
line wrap: on
line source
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue522 In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge revision. $ hg init $ echo foo > foo $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo' $ echo bar >> foo $ hg ci -m 'change foo' $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo' reverting foo changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e $ hg up -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ touch bar $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar' $ hg merge --debug searching for copies back to rev 1 unmatched files in local: bar resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee foo: remote is newer -> g getting foo updating: foo 1/1 files (100.00%) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg debugstate | grep foo m 0 -2 unset foo $ hg st -A foo M foo $ hg ci -m 'merge' $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644 foo $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 5 ..... 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 5 9 ..... 1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re) 2 14 5 ..... 2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)