view tests/test-merge-combination-exec-bytes.t @ 46386:d6fa9fbd375d stable

commit: reorder if-else conditional to give mergestate info priority

Looking at the code now, I was unable to find a good reason as why we only rely
on mergestate extras info after checking whether a filelog parent is ancestor of
other or not.

I mean if we have stored in mergestate that `other` was chosed, we should
blindly pick that one.

This cleanup will also help introduce more cases when both `fparent1` and
`fparent2` are non-null but using info from mergestate, we can fastpath.

The test change actually demonstrates the point of the patch. During merge we
were getting the other side of the file but on commit we were marking that as
merged.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10147

Testing recorded "modified" files for merge commit
==================================================

#require execbit

This file shows what hg says are "modified" files for a merge commit
(hg log -T {files}), somewhat exhaustively.

This test file shows merges that involves executable bit changing, check test-merge-combination-exec-bytes.t

For merges that involve files contents changing, check test-merge-combination-file-content.t

For testing of multiple corner case, check test-merge-combination-misc.t

Case with multiple or zero merge ancestors, copies/renames, and identical file contents
with different filelog revisions are not currently covered.

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/merge-combination-util.sh

All the merges of executable bit.

  $ range () {
  >   max=a
  >   for i in $@; do
  >     if [ $i = - ]; then continue; fi
  >     if [ $i > $max ]; then max=$i; fi
  >   done
  >   if [ $max = a ]; then echo f; else echo f x; fi
  > }
  $ isgood () { case $line in *f*x*) true;; *) false;; esac; }
  $ createfile () {
  >   if [ -f a ] && (([ -x a ] && [ $v = x ]) || (! [ -x a ] && [ $v != x ]))
  >   then touch $file
  >   else touch a; if [ $v = x ]; then chmod +x a; else chmod -x a; fi
  >   fi
  > }

  $ genmerges
  fffx  : agree on "a"
  ffxf  : agree on "a"
  ffxx  : agree on ""
  ffx-  : agree on "a"
  ff-x  : hg said "", expected "a"
  fxff  : hg said "", expected "a"
  fxfx  : hg said "a", expected ""
  fxf-  : agree on "a"
  fxxf  : agree on "a"
  fxxx  : agree on ""
  fxx-  : agree on "a"
  fx-f  : hg said "", expected "a"
  fx-x  : hg said "", expected "a"
  fx--  : hg said "", expected "a"
  f-fx  : agree on "a"
  f-xf  : agree on "a"
  f-xx  : hg said "", expected "a"
  f-x-  : agree on "a"
  f--x  : agree on "a"
  -ffx  : agree on "a"
  -fxf C: agree on "a"
  -fxx C: hg said "", expected "a"
  -fx- C: agree on "a"
  -f-x  : hg said "", expected "a"
  --fx  : agree on "a"