view tests/test-bisect2.t @ 39583:ee087f0d7db5

util: allow lrucachedict to track cost of entries

Currently, lrucachedict allows tracking of arbitrary items with the
only limit being the total number of items in the cache.

Caches can be a lot more useful when they are bound by the size
of the items in them rather than the number of elements in the
cache.

In preparation for teaching lrucachedict to enforce a max size of
cached items, we teach lrucachedict to optionally associate a numeric
cost value with each node.

We purposefully let the caller define their own cost for nodes.

This does introduce some overhead. Most of it comes from __setitem__,
since that function now calls into insert(), thus introducing Python
function call overhead.

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000
! gets
! wall 0.599552 comb 0.600000 user 0.600000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! wall 0.614643 comb 0.610000 user 0.610000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts
! <not available>
! wall 0.655817 comb 0.650000 user 0.650000 sys 0.000000 (best of 16)
! sets
! wall 0.540448 comb 0.540000 user 0.540000 sys 0.000000 (best of 18)
! wall 0.805644 comb 0.810000 user 0.810000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! mixed
! wall 0.651556 comb 0.660000 user 0.660000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! wall 0.781357 comb 0.780000 user 0.780000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000
! gets
! wall 0.621014 comb 0.620000 user 0.620000 sys 0.000000 (best of 16)
! wall 0.615146 comb 0.620000 user 0.620000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts
! <not available>
! wall 0.698115 comb 0.700000 user 0.700000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! sets
! wall 0.560247 comb 0.560000 user 0.560000 sys 0.000000 (best of 18)
! wall 0.832495 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12)
! mixed
! wall 0.686172 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! wall 0.841359 comb 0.840000 user 0.840000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12)

We're still under 1us per insert, which seems like reasonable
performance for a cache.

If we comment out updating of self.totalcost during insert(),
performance of insert() is identical to __setitem__ before. However,
I don't want to make total cost evaluation lazy because it has
significant performance implications for when we need to evaluate the
total cost at mutation time (it requires a cache traversal, which could
be expensive for large caches).

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4502

# The tests in test-bisect are done on a linear history. Here the
# following repository history is used for testing:
#
#                      17
#                       |
#                18    16
#                  \  /
#                   15
#                  /  \
#                 /    \
#               10     13
#               / \     |
#              /   \    |  14
#         7   6     9  12 /
#          \ / \    |   |/
#           4   \   |  11
#            \   \  |  /
#             3   5 | /
#              \ /  |/
#               2   8
#                \ /
#                 1
#                 |
#                 0

init

  $ hg init

committing changes

  $ echo > a
  $ echo '0' >> a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg ci -m "0" -d "0 0"
  $ echo '1' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "1" -d "1 0"
  $ echo '2' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "2" -d "2 0"
  $ echo '3' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "3" -d "3 0"
  $ echo '4' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "4" -d "4 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '5' >> b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg ci -m "5" -d "5 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 4,5" -d "6 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 4
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '7' > c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg ci -m "7" -d "7 0"
  created new head

create branch

  $ hg up -r 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '8' > d
  $ hg add d
  $ hg ci -m "8" -d "8 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '9' >> d
  $ hg ci -m "9" -d "9 0"

merge

  $ hg merge -r 6
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 6,9" -d "10 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 8
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '11' > e
  $ hg add e
  $ hg ci -m "11" -d "11 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '12' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "12" -d "12 0"
  $ echo '13' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "13" -d "13 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 11
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '14' > f
  $ hg add f
  $ hg ci -m "14" -d "14 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg up -r 13 -C
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge -r 10
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 10,13" -d "15 0"
  $ echo '16' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "16" -d "16 0"
  $ echo '17' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "17" -d "17 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 15
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '18' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "18" -d "18 0"
  created new head

log

  $ hg log
  changeset:   18:d42e18c7bc9b
  tag:         tip
  parent:      15:857b178a7cf3
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:18 1970 +0000
  summary:     18
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   14:faa450606157
  parent:      11:82ca6f06eccd
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000
  summary:     14
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   12:9f259202bbe7
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000
  summary:     12
  
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   8:dab8161ac8fc
  parent:      1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000
  summary:     8
  
  changeset:   7:50c76098bbf2
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000
  summary:     7
  
  changeset:   6:a214d5d3811a
  parent:      5:385a529b6670
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 4,5
  
  changeset:   5:385a529b6670
  parent:      2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000
  summary:     5
  
  changeset:   4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
  summary:     4
  
  changeset:   3:0950834f0a9c
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
  summary:     3
  
  changeset:   2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  summary:     2
  
  changeset:   1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  summary:     1
  
  changeset:   0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     0
  

hg up -C

  $ hg up -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updated to "d42e18c7bc9b: 18"
  3 other heads for branch "default"

complex bisect test 1  # first bad rev is 9

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 0
  $ hg bisect -b 17   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (15 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 8
  Testing changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (2 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 2  # first good rev is 13

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 18
  $ hg bisect -b 1    # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  6:a214d5d3811a
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g
  The first good revision is:
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 3

first bad rev is 15
10,9,13 are skipped an might be the first bad revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 1
  $ hg bisect -b 16   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -b
  Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'

complex bisect test 4

first good revision is 17
15,16 are skipped an might be the first good revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 17
  $ hg bisect -b 8    # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 16
  Testing changeset 16:609d82a7ebae (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s
  Due to skipped revisions, the first good revision could be any of:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46

test unrelated revs:

  $ hg bisect --reset
  $ hg bisect -b 7
  $ hg bisect -g 14
  abort: starting revisions are not directly related
  [255]
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  7:50c76098bbf2
  14:faa450606157
  $ hg bisect --reset

end at merge: 17 bad, 11 good (but 9 is first bad)

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 17
  $ hg bisect -g 11
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  Not all ancestors of this changeset have been checked.
  Use bisect --extend to continue the bisection from
  the common ancestor, dab8161ac8fc.
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect --extend
  Extending search to changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g # dab8161ac8fc
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

user adds irrelevant but consistent information (here: -g 2) to bisect state

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 13
  $ hg bisect -g 8
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -g 2
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  14:faa450606157
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'