merge: suggest 'hg up -C .' for discarding changes, not 'hg up -C'
Without specifying the parent revision of the working copy, users will
update to tip, which is most likely the other head they were trying to
merge, not the revision they were at before the merge.
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a > a
$ hg add -n
adding a
$ hg st
? a
$ hg add
adding a
$ hg st
A a
$ hg forget a
$ hg add
adding a
$ hg st
A a
$ echo b > b
$ hg add -n b
$ hg st
A a
? b
$ hg add b || echo "failed to add b"
$ hg st
A a
A b
should fail
$ hg add b
b already tracked!
$ hg st
A a
A b
$ hg ci -m 0 --traceback
should fail
$ hg add a
a already tracked!
$ echo aa > a
$ hg ci -m 1
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo aaa > a
$ hg ci -m 2
created new head
$ hg merge
merging a
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging a failed!
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
$ hg st
M a
? a.orig
should fail
$ hg add a
a already tracked!
$ hg st
M a
? a.orig
$ hg resolve -m a
$ hg ci -m merge
issue683
$ hg forget a
$ hg add a
$ hg st
? a.orig
$ hg rm a
$ hg st
R a
? a.orig
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg st
M a
? a.orig
$ hg add c && echo "unexpected addition of missing file"
c: No such file or directory
$ echo c > c
$ hg add d c && echo "unexpected addition of missing file"
d: No such file or directory
$ hg st
M a
A c
? a.orig