Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:32:31 -0700 merge with stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:32:31 -0700] rev 38431
merge with stable
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:49:06 -0700 split: preserve phase of commit that is being split
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:49:06 -0700] rev 38430
split: preserve phase of commit that is being split With this change, hg split will preserve the phase of the commit that is being split, ignoring the phases.new-commit setting. Previously, we would use whatever phases.new-commit was set to (unless our parent was secret, then we would be secret even if phases.new-commit=draft). Now, splitting a draft commit with phases.new-commit=secret does not cause the new commits to become secret, and splitting a secret commit with phases.new-commit=draft and a draft parent does not cause the new commits to become draft. Test cases and commit message taken from Kyle Lippincott's D2016 (thanks!). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3819
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:07:40 -0700 scmutil: make cleanupnodes optionally also fix the phase
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:07:40 -0700] rev 38429
scmutil: make cleanupnodes optionally also fix the phase We have had multiple bugs where the phase wasn't correctly carried forward to a rewritten changeset (for example: phabricator, split, evolve, fix). Handling the phase update in cleanupnodes() makes it less likely to happen again, especially once we have made it fix the phase by default (perhaps in the next release cycle). This patch also updates all applicable callers so we get some testing of it. Note that rebase and histedit can't be fixed yet because they call cleanupnodes() only at the end and the phase may have been changed by the user when the rebase/histedit was interrupted (due to merge conflicts). I think we should make them write one commit at a time (as it already does), along with associated obsmarkers, bookmark moves, etc. When that's done, we can switch them over to cleanupnodes(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3818
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:07:23 -0700 tests: add test of uncommit with default phase as secret
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:07:23 -0700] rev 38428
tests: add test of uncommit with default phase as secret We didn't seem to have any test checking that uncommitting a draft commit with phase.new-phase=secret preserved the draft phase. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3817
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:52:08 +0530 grep: add --diff flag
Sangeet Kumar Mishra <mail2sangeetmishra@gmail.com> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:52:08 +0530] rev 38427
grep: add --diff flag Adds a diff flag, which works exactly same as all, in fact since --all searches diffs, there diff is a better name for it. The all flag is still here for backward compatibility reasons. Some major tests for all has been picked and added for diff. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3763
Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:27:30 -0700 fix: include cleanupnodes() in transaction
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:27:30 -0700] rev 38426
fix: include cleanupnodes() in transaction As pointed out by Yuya, we need a transaction to make sure the state before the call to cleanupnodes() is not observable. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3823
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:19:37 -0700 progress: enforce use of complete() on the helper class
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:19:37 -0700] rev 38425
progress: enforce use of complete() on the helper class complete() is preferred over update(None), so let's enforce that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3822
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:11:34 -0700 progress: extract function for closing topic
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:11:34 -0700] rev 38424
progress: extract function for closing topic progress(None) had a completely different implementation from the progress(<not None>) implementation. It very much feels like it should be a separate method, so this patch makes it so. That also makes it clear that only the topic parameter matters when closing a topic (e.g. "total" does not matter). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3821
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:06:28 -0700 progress: use context manager for lock
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:06:28 -0700] rev 38423
progress: use context manager for lock Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3820
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:21:37 +0200 configitem: reorder items in the 'server' section
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:21:37 +0200] rev 38422
configitem: reorder items in the 'server' section Keeping things alphabetically sorted.
Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:48:59 -0400 test-lfs: add coverage for the binary() fileset
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:48:59 -0400] rev 38421
test-lfs: add coverage for the binary() fileset This ensures that the blobs don't need to be present to be filtered properly.
Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:05:26 -0400 fileset: use filectx.isbinary() to filter out binaries in eol()
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:05:26 -0400] rev 38420
fileset: use filectx.isbinary() to filter out binaries in eol() Since LFS stores the binary attribute in the pointer file, this means that the file doesn't need to be downloaded in order to be skipped. This function also catches an IOError if the data can't be loaded in the non-LFS case. I wonder if it's worth storing the unix/dos attributes in the pointer file as well, though I'd expect LFS files to be binary most of the time.
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:07:18 +0300 crecord: re-center display in interactive curses commit on pageup/down
Matti Hamalainen <ccr@tnsp.org> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:07:18 +0300] rev 38419
crecord: re-center display in interactive curses commit on pageup/down A long-standing issue in the crecord (interactive curses commit interface) is that using PageUp/Down to move along longer-than current screen size chunks would "lose" the cursor and not properly re-center. There has been self.recenterdisplayedarea() to do that, but it has not been in use for some reason. Add calls to the appropriate uparrowshiftevent() and downarrowshiftevent() methods to fix this.
Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:21:04 -0800 tests: in test-split.t, save a "clean" copy of pre-split repo for later use
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:21:04 -0800] rev 38418
tests: in test-split.t, save a "clean" copy of pre-split repo for later use Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2015
Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:01:06 -0700 tests: use progress helper
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:01:06 -0700] rev 38417
tests: use progress helper With this commit, the only in-tree caller of ui.progress() is scmutil.progress(). That means that we could deprecate it. It also means that we can considering inlining it in scmutil.progress. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3812
Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:55:38 -0700 changegroup: use progress helper
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:55:38 -0700] rev 38416
changegroup: use progress helper Although it looks like this code was micro-optimized, I could not measure any slow-down. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3811
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -16 +16 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip