Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:33:01 +0900 formatter: proxy fm.context() through converter
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:33:01 +0900] rev 33102
formatter: proxy fm.context() through converter Otherwise nested template formatter would not see the context objects. It's just a boolean flag now. We might want to change it to 'ctxs -> items' function so changectx attributes are populated automatically in JSON, but I'm not sure.
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:18:55 +0900 identify: change p1/p2 to a list of parents
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:18:55 +0900] rev 33101
identify: change p1/p2 to a list of parents It makes sense because the nested data structure is a list of items.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:31:56 -0700 scmutil: add a cleanupnodes method for developers
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:31:56 -0700] rev 33100
scmutil: add a cleanupnodes method for developers It's now common that an old node gets replaced by zero or more new nodes, that could happen with amend, rebase, histedit, etc. And it's a common requirement to do bookmark movements, strip or obsolete nodes and even moving working copy parent. Previously, amend, rebase, history have their own logic doing the above. This patch is an attempt to unify them and future code. This enables new developers to be able to do "replace X with Y" thing correctly, without any knowledge about bookmarks, strip or obsstore. The next step will be migrating rebase to the new API, so it works inside a transaction, and its code could be simplified.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:38:45 -0700 strip: add a delayedstrip method that works in a transaction
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:38:45 -0700] rev 33099
strip: add a delayedstrip method that works in a transaction For long, the fact that strip does not work inside a transaction and some code has to work with both obsstore and fallback to strip lead to duplicated code like: with repo.transaction(): .... if obsstore: obsstore.createmarkers(...) if not obsstore: repair.strip(...) Things get more complex when you want to call something which may call strip under the hood. Like you cannot simply write: with repo.transaction(): .... rebasemod.rebase(...) # may call "strip", so this doesn't work But you do want rebase to run inside a same transaction if possible, so the code may look like: with repo.transaction(): .... if obsstore: rebasemod.rebase(...) obsstore.createmarkers(...) if not obsstore: rebasemod.rebase(...) repair.strip(...) That's ugly and error-prone. Ideally it's possible to just write: with repo.transaction(): rebasemod.rebase(...) saferemovenodes(...) This patch is the first step towards that. It adds a "delayedstrip" method to repair.py which maintains a postclose callback in the transaction object.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:30:14 -0700 workingfilectx: add audit() as a wrapper for wvfs.audit()
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:30:14 -0700] rev 33098
workingfilectx: add audit() as a wrapper for wvfs.audit()
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:30:14 -0700 workingfilectx: add backgroundclose as a kwarg to write()
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:30:14 -0700] rev 33097
workingfilectx: add backgroundclose as a kwarg to write() This is necessary because some callers in merge.py pass backgroundclose=True when writing. As with previous changes in this series, this should be a no-op.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:29:09 -0700 merge: change repo.wvfs.setflags calls to a new wctx[f].setflags function
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:29:09 -0700] rev 33096
merge: change repo.wvfs.setflags calls to a new wctx[f].setflags function As with previous changes in this series, this should be a no-op.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:00:15 -0700 merge: convert repo.wwrite() calls to wctx[f].write()
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:00:15 -0700] rev 33095
merge: convert repo.wwrite() calls to wctx[f].write() As with the previous patch in this series, workingfilectx.write() is a direct call to repo.wwrite(), so this change should be a no-op.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:58:26 -0700 merge: replace repo.wvfs.unlinkpath() with calls to wctx[f].remove()
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:58:26 -0700] rev 33094
merge: replace repo.wvfs.unlinkpath() with calls to wctx[f].remove() The code inside workingfilectx.remove() is a straight call to repo.wvfs.unlinkpath, so this should be a no-op.
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:56:49 -0700 merge: pass wctx to batchremove and batchget
Phil Cohen <phillco@fb.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:56:49 -0700] rev 33093
merge: pass wctx to batchremove and batchget We would like to migrate direct calls of repo.wvfs/wwrite/wread/etc to a call on the relevant workingfilectx, both as a cleanup (to reduce the number of working copy functions on `repo`), and also to facilitate an in-memory merge that doesn't write to the working copy. In order to do that, the first step is to ensure we pass the target wctx around and perform our writes and reads on it. Later, this object might become a memctx.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip