Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:57:03 -0500 largefiles: port wrapped functions to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:57:03 -0500] rev 41065
largefiles: port wrapped functions to exthelper Things get interesting in the commit. I hadn't seen issue6033 on Windows, and yet it is now reproducible 100% of the time on Windows 10 with this commit. I didn't test Linux. (For comparison, after seeing this issue, I tested on the parent with --loop, and it failed 5 times out of over 1300 tests.) The strange thing is that largefiles has nothing to do with that test (it's not even mentioned there). It isn't autoloading run amuck- it occurs even if largefiles is explicitly disabled, and also if the entry in afterhgrcload() is commented out. It's also not the import of lfutil- I disabled that by copying the function into lfs and removing the import, and the problem still occurs. Experimenting further, it seems that the problem is isolated to 3 entries: exchange.pushoperation, hg.clone, and cmdutil.revert. If those decorators are all commented out, the test passes when run in a loop for awhile. (Obviously, some largefiles tests will fail.) But if any one is commented back in, the test fails immediately. I left one method related to wrapping the wire protocol, because it seemed more natural with the TODO. Also, exthelper doesn't support wrapping functions from another extension, only commands in another extension. I didn't try to figure out why rebase is both command wrapped and function wrapped.
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:26:25 -0500 largefiles: port commands to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:26:25 -0500] rev 41064
largefiles: port commands to exthelper One subtle change here is that the purge, rebase and transplant extensions are wrapped in extsetup() instead of uisetup().
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:54:56 -0500 exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:54:56 -0500] rev 41063
exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command Largefiles uses this 5th argument with push and pull, so this will be tested in the next commit. I assume the reason for unrolling and reforming the tuple in each finalxxxsetup() is to validate that something proper was passed in when registering. But it's better to explode when decorating than during the delayed actual registration.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip