Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:39:00 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:39:00 +0100] rev 51581
branching: merge stable into default
Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:27:48 +0000 branching: merge stable into default
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:27:48 +0000] rev 51580
branching: merge stable into default
Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:57:16 +0100 branchcache: allow to detect "pure topological case" for branchmap
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:57:16 +0100] rev 51579
branchcache: allow to detect "pure topological case" for branchmap We don't rum this detection every time we run the branchcache, that would be costly. However we now do it when running `hg debugupdatecache`. This will help existing repository to benefit from the fastpath when possible.
Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:15:23 +0100 branchcache: add a "pure topological head" fast path
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:15:23 +0100] rev 51578
branchcache: add a "pure topological head" fast path In a narrow but actually quick common case, all topological heads are all on the same branch and all open. In this case, computing the branch map is very simple. We can quickly detect situation where this situation will not change. So we update the V3 format to be able to express this situation and upgrade the update code to detect we remains in that mode. The branch cache is populated with the actual value when the branch map is accessed, but the update_disk method can do the update without needing to populate it.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:18:03 +0100 branchcache: move the processing of the new data in a dedicated method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:18:03 +0100] rev 51577
branchcache: move the processing of the new data in a dedicated method In a future changeset, this will allow the V3 of the branch cache to use a fast path when possible.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:10:44 +0100 branchcache: gather newly closed head in a dedicated set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:10:44 +0100] rev 51576
branchcache: gather newly closed head in a dedicated set This is part of a series to more clearly split the update in two step. This will allow us to introduce a fast path during update in a future changeset.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:09:42 +0100 branchcache: gather new obsolete revision in a set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:09:42 +0100] rev 51575
branchcache: gather new obsolete revision in a set This is part of a series to more clearly split the update in two step. This will allow us to introduce a fast path during update in a future changeset.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:54:22 +0100 branchcache: filter obsolete revisions sooner
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:54:22 +0100] rev 51574
branchcache: filter obsolete revisions sooner Since we won't do anything with the obsolete revisions, we can just ignore them sooner.
Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:55:22 +0100 branchcache: skip entries that are topological heads in the on disk file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:55:22 +0100] rev 51573
branchcache: skip entries that are topological heads in the on disk file In the majority of cases, topological heads are also branch heads. We have efficient way to get the topological heads and efficient way to retrieve their branch information. So there is little value in putting them in the branch cache file explicitly. On the contrary, writing them explicitly tend to create very large cache file that are inefficient to read and update. So the branch cache v3 format is no longer including them. This changeset focus on the format aspect and have no focus on the performance aspect. We will cover that later.
Thu, 07 Mar 2024 01:35:43 +0100 branchcache: simplify the branch rev cache test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 01:35:43 +0100] rev 51572
branchcache: simplify the branch rev cache test We don't need that many content dump and this gets in the way in change in access pattern (e.g. accessing revision in a different order change the order of branches in the "names" file). So we simplify this test in advance.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:39:44 +0100 branchcache: store filtered hash and obsolete hash independently for V3
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:39:44 +0100] rev 51571
branchcache: store filtered hash and obsolete hash independently for V3 This will avoid the bug covered in tests/test-branches-obsolete.t when we stop storing all heads explicitly in V3.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 12:07:31 +0100 branchcache: show the cache file content in test-branches-obsoletes.t
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 12:07:31 +0100] rev 51570
branchcache: show the cache file content in test-branches-obsoletes.t This help to track the changes in format between v2 and v3.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 02:20:53 +0100 branchcache: rework the `filteredhash` logic to be more generic
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 02:20:53 +0100] rev 51569
branchcache: rework the `filteredhash` logic to be more generic We now have a more flexible `key_hashes` tuple. We duplicated various logic in the V2 and V3 version of the cache as the goal is to start changing the logic for V3 in the next few changesets.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 01:53:52 +0100 filteredhash: rename the filteredhash function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 01:53:52 +0100] rev 51568
filteredhash: rename the filteredhash function The new name is less ambiguous, as we are about to introduce an alternative function it seems like a good idea to have clearer name to distinct the two.
Wed, 06 Mar 2024 01:43:51 +0100 filteredhash: split the computation of revision sets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2024 01:43:51 +0100] rev 51567
filteredhash: split the computation of revision sets The branch2's filteredhash combines the filtered revisions and the obsolete ones, this will creates issue for implicit reference to heads we want to introduce for the v3 of the branch cache format. So we isolate this logic for alternative use.
Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:21:18 +0100 filteredhash: move the hashing in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:21:18 +0100] rev 51566
filteredhash: move the hashing in its own function This will help us to reuse this logic in variants of the hashes used for branch cache validation.
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:31:50 +0100 branchcache: cleanup the final key generation after update
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:31:50 +0100] rev 51565
branchcache: cleanup the final key generation after update A lot of duplicated work seemed to be done, as we already update the tiprev and tipnode when needed right before. So we simplify that part to focus on the filtered hash. See inline comment for details.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:56:08 +0100 branchcache: add more test for the logic around obsolescence and branch heads
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:56:08 +0100] rev 51564
branchcache: add more test for the logic around obsolescence and branch heads While working on branch-cache-v3, we noticed some ambiguity in the filtered+obsolete hash. However this was only caught by a rebase test by chance. It seems important to explicitly tests these cases.
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:44:44 +0100 branchcache-v3: use more explicit header line
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:44:44 +0100] rev 51563
branchcache-v3: use more explicit header line The key-value approach is clearer and gives more rooms to have the format evolve in a clear way. It also provides extension (like topic) simpler way to extend the validation scheme. This is just a small evolution, the V3 format is still a work in progress.
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:20:36 +0100 branchcache-v3: introduce a v3 format
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:20:36 +0100] rev 51562
branchcache-v3: introduce a v3 format For now the format is the very same, however we will start changing it in future changesets.
Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:04:29 +0100 branchcache: use an explicit class for the v2 version
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:04:29 +0100] rev 51561
branchcache: use an explicit class for the v2 version This prepare the introduction of an experimental v3 format version. In the process, we move the description of the format in that new class.
Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:33:21 +0100 branchcache: add some blank line in a test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:33:21 +0100] rev 51560
branchcache: add some blank line in a test This helps each section to stand out.
Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0100] rev 51559
branching: merge stable into default
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:52:51 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:52:51 +0100] rev 51558
branching: merge stable into default
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:29:12 +0100 branchcache: use update_disk to refresh 'served' and 'served.hidden'
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:29:12 +0100] rev 51557
branchcache: use update_disk to refresh 'served' and 'served.hidden' The `update_disk` method is dedicated to this kind of usecase. Now that the writting patterns are more consistent, we can use it to warm these two important cache. I am dropping the first comment about "refreshing all the others" because it is false. If a branchmap already exist for "served", none of the subset will be updated.
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:25:04 +0100 branchcache: explictly update disk state only if no transaction exist
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:25:04 +0100] rev 51556
branchcache: explictly update disk state only if no transaction exist If a transaction exist the `write_dirty` call will eventually be done and the state will be synched on disk. It is better to no interfer with that.
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:32:50 +0100 branchcache: do not use `__getitem__` in updatecache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:32:50 +0100] rev 51555
branchcache: do not use `__getitem__` in updatecache The `update_disk` method uses `updatecache` and the point of `update_disk` is to be able to do alternative processing to the one we do in `__getitem__`. So we calling `__getitem__` in `updatecache` defeat this purpose. Instead we do the equivalent explicitly to preserve the spirit of `update_disk` (that we will actually put to use soon, I promise)
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 05:10:00 +0100 branchcache: explicitly track inheritence "state"
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 05:10:00 +0100] rev 51554
branchcache: explicitly track inheritence "state" We move from a binary "dirty" flag to a three value "state": "clean", "inherited", "dirty". The "inherited" means that the branch cache is not only "clean", but it is a duplicate of its parent filter. If a branch cache is "inherited", we can non only skip writing its value on disk, but it is a good idea to delete any stale value on disk, as those will just waste time (and possibly induce bug) in the future. We only do this in the update related to transaction or explicit cache update (e.g `hg debugupdatecache`). Deleting the file when we simply detected a stall cache during a read only operation seems more dangerous. We rename `copy` to `inherit_for` to clarify we associate a stronger semantic to the operation.
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100 branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100] rev 51553
branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed Before this change, we were unconditionally writing a branchmap file for the filter level passed to `update_disk`. This is actually counter productive if no update were needed for this filter level. In many case, the branch cache for a filter level is identical to its parent "subset" and it is better to simply keep the subset update and reuse it every time instead of having to do identical work for similar subset. So we change the `update_disk` method to only write a file when that filter level differ from its parent. This removes many cases where identical files were written, requiring multiple boring update in the test suite. The only notable changes is the change to `test-strip-branch-cache.t`, this case was checking a scenario that no longer reproduce the bug as writing less branchmap file result in less stalled cache on disk. Strictly speaking, we could create a more convoluted scenario that create a similar issue. However the next changeset would also cover that scenario so we directly updated that test case to a "no longer buggy" state.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100 branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100] rev 51552
branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag If the inherited branch cache is dirty, it will be written on disk, and the super-set did not need to modify it, the on disk value for the subset will be re-useable as is. So the super set does not needs to write the very same content itself.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 tip